|
Second Quarter 1998
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
Public & Private
Partnership
Affordable Parade of Homes
Marketing a Dream
Brenda Aguilar knew from the moment
she walked into the house in Villas de Esperanza in February
1997 that it would be her home. The house was one of 24 custom
homes built for the second Affordable Parade of Homes—a
new take on a successful marketing tool that San Antonio is
using to revitalize its inner city.
Yolie Rios, program director of the
San Antonio Housing Trust Foundation, a nonprofit that helps
create affordable housing, met with the Aguilars. "Brenda
was really excited," Rios recalls. "But David was
apprehensive about buying a home." The foundation qualified
buyers for Villas de Esperanza, so Rios explained the special
financing available to first-time home buyers. However, David
was concerned that buying the house would interfere with his
plans to send his two daughters to college.
Both Jennifer and Cathy promised they
would work nights and weekends to save for college if they
had to. "I just want my own room, like my friends,"
Jennifer pleaded. That was the turning point, Rios says. And
on March 7, 1997, the Aguilars closed on the three-bedroom,
two-bath house and began making it their home.
A year later, when Rios visited the
Aguilars, she found the family happily settled. Brenda had
hung curtains and added personal touches. The girls, who had
posted their names on the doors of their rooms, had decorated
to reflect their individual personalities. David, who was
very happy with his decision to become a homeowner, was planning
to fence his yard with money from his income tax refund.
Although both Brenda and David have
stable work histories and hold full-time jobs, they, like
many other hardworking families, felt they did not earn enough
to purchase a home. To address this problem, a cross-section
of nonprofits, builders, lenders and government agencies developed
a program that is making home ownership possible for many
low- and moderate-income families. This public/private partnership
includes several area banks, the Greater San Antonio Builders
Association, the San Antonio Housing Trust Foundation, the
San Antonio Development Agency, the city, not-for-profit and
for-profit builders, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD), and the San Antonio Mortgage Bankers Association.
Home parades have been used in San Antonio
to promote higher end developments for 30 years, but using
one to promote affordable housing was a new idea. In 1995
then city council member Ruth Jones McClendon, now a state
representative, and John Salmons, president of the home builders
association, promoted the idea as a way to help the city provide
more affordable housing. The result has been three Affordable
Parade of Homes developments.
All three parades have been highly successful.
Villas de Esperanza, developed for the second parade in February
1997, offers a good example of how the process works. Villas
de Esperanza—Spanish for "houses of hope"—transformed
almost 11 acres of inner-city property into a $3 million development
that generates approximately $90,000 in annual tax revenues.
Louis Hull, John and Oran Kirkpatrick
and the Oscar Elizondo family donated the land for Villas
de Esperanza to the city. Using HUD block grants, the city
corrected drainage problems, platted the site and constructed
streets before transferring 52 lots to the San Antonio Housing
Trust Investment Corp., which handles real estate for the
foundation. The corporation then sold lots to builders for
$3,000 each. The proceeds of the sale will be used as seed
money for future parades.
Local lending institutions provided
both interim financing to builders and special mortgage programs
for buyers. "To encourage builders to participate, Frost
Bank's interim financing for Villas de Esperanza carried a
very attractive interest rate, and we waived the typical commitment
fee," says Deborah Boyer, assistant vice president in
the Community Reinvestment Department at Frost National Bank.
Twelve local builders, both for-profit and nonprofit, built
24 houses for the parade.
Like the other major lenders for the
parade of homes, Frost used more flexible underwriting guidelines
on Villas de Esperanza mortgages for low- to moderate-income
applicants. The Frost program reduced the required down payment
and placed no restrictions on using second mortgages to raise
the money. "Our program provides considerable flexibility
in qualifying applicants," explains Boyer. "However,
this program makes many of these loans ineligible for resale
to the secondary market; therefore they remain in our portfolio."
The San Antonio Housing Trust Foundation,
headed by Tim Hathaway, offered 3.5 percent, 30-year second
mortgages of $10,000 to first-time buyers with annual earnings
below 120 percent of the area's adjusted median income. Making
the special financing package available to middle-income as
well as low- and moderate-income buyers helped attract a diverse
economic mix to the neighborhood.
Building houses within the $48,000 to
$68,000 price range demanded creativity and ingenuity from
the designers. In Villas de Esperanza, built-in recessed shelving,
pass-through bars, under-stairs storage and multifunction
areas helped make the best use of the average 1,100 square
feet in the homes. Vaulted ceilings, bay windows and 10-foot
ceilings added volume and light.
Buyers found some surprising features
in Villas de Esperanza homes, such as a separate shower and
tub in the master bath, a step-up dining area with arched
entry and crown molding—all normally found in larger,
more expensive homes.
The homes were not only affordably priced;
they were designed with an eye toward affordable maintenance.
Specifications included low-flow toilets and water-saving
showerheads, double-pane windows, high-efficiency insulation
and energy-saving appliances. Elevated slabs that tilt and
move with the area's shifting soils help prevent drywall cracks
and structural damage. Some builders used fiber-cement siding
that is fire/termite/decay-resistant and guaranteed for 50
years. All 24 of the spec houses built for the Villas de Esperanza
parade sold within three weeks of the event, and builders
signed contracts for homes on the 28 remaining lots over the
next two months.
Building on the success of the first
two affordable parades, the September 1997 parade attracted
16 builders. The development, called Historic Gardens, is
the first of a four-phase project to revitalize an area just
east of downtown. Designs for the 21 homes had to meet strict
specifications to keep new construction in character with
the 1940s style of the surrounding neighborhood. Porches,
set-back garages and paint schemes reminiscent of yesteryear
ensure the new construction fits comfortably among the existing
residences. The houses are a little bigger than those in previous
parades—up to 1,655 square feet and including some two-story
structures—and priced from $49,950 to $69,900.
The National Association of Home Builders
met in San Antonio during the week of the Historic Gardens
parade, and many of the visiting builders toured the homes.
Inspired by what they saw, builders from dozens of cities
have requested information on the San Antonio program. Las
Cruces, New Mexico, is currently developing an affordable
homes parade of its own.
The affordable parades illustrate the
importance of public/private partnerships in creating and
marketing affordable housing. No single entity could have
developed these affordable-home subdivisions on its own, says
Hathaway. The risk of acquiring land and providing an infrastructure
in a depressed area without the intervention of the city and
the use of block grants would have prohibited an individual
builder from undertaking the project. Lenders would have been
reluctant to finance such a project, and, with limited funds,
not-for-profits could not afford to underwrite all the costs.
"But with all of us contributing
resources to develop an ingenious idea, San Antonio created
a new tool for revitalizing inner-city neighborhoods,"
Hathaway concludes.
Fast Facts
Villas de Esperanza, built
for the February 1997 Affordable Parade of Homes
sponsored by the Greater San Antonio Builders
Association, turned 11 acres of vacant land into
a subdivision of 52 moderately priced homes. Now
worth $3 million, the property generates about
$90,000 in annual tax revenues. San Antonio used
HUD block grants totaling $926,000 to correct
drainage, plat the site and construct streets.
The city transferred the lots to the San Antonio
Housing Trust Investment Corp., which sold them
to builders for $3,000 each. Brenda and David
Aguilar purchased their three-bedroom, two-bath
home during the parade for $65,900.
Property: Single
family home in Villas de Esperanza
Builder: Fred
Elsner of Franklin Homes
Interim Construction Loan
to Builder Frost
National Bank—$50,000
First Mortgage to Aguilar
Family (30-year fixed)
Frost National Bank—$58,100
Second Lien Mortage to
Aguilar Family
San Antonio Housing
Trust Foundation—$10,000
(Financing for down payment and closing costs
at 3.5 percent interest for 30 years)
For more information:
San Antonio Housing
Trust Foundation, Inc.
(210) 225-4761 |
|
The Economics
of Home Ownership
Emerging Markets of the Next Millennium
James H. Carr, Senior Vice President,
Fannie Mae Foundation
Home ownership is vitally important
to the economic health of the nation and its households. At
the national level, the housing industry generates millions
of jobs and is a significant contributor to economic growth.
At the household level, home ownership is the principal vehicle
for wealth accumulation and affords significant tax benefits
for many homeowners.
The household-level economic benefits
of home ownership are not shared equally across different
racial and ethnic groups, however. Persistent disparities
in home-ownership attainment contribute to overall economic
inequality and constrain the potential economic benefits of
home ownership to the nation. Removing these disparities will
become increasingly important as growth in minority demand
for housing accelerates in the future.
Economic Benefits of Home Ownership
Nationally, residential construction
directly employs about 3 million workers, and related industries
employ another 3 million. Residential construction and investment,
when combined with housing sales and housing-related expenditures,
account for about 20 percent of gross domestic product.
In addition to the employment and expenditures
generated by single-family housing construction, home financing
is a major factor in the national economy. Mortgage debt outstanding
on one- to four-family housing is roughly double the combined
value of commercial paper and consumer credit. In addition,
mortgage debt on single-family housing accounts for the bulk
of all outstanding long-term mortgage debt.
Home ownership is also important to
the economic situation of individual households. Primary residences
and associated land are worth $7.2 trillion. After subtracting
mortgage debt outstanding, net equity in these assets amounts
to $4.6 trillion. Equity in a principal residence is the primary
source of wealth for most Americans, accounting for 44 percent
of total measured household net worth in 1993.
Beyond wealth accumulation, home ownership
offers substantial tax benefits for many households. According
to estimates from the U.S. Congress Joint Committee on Taxation,
homeowners will be the beneficiaries of an estimated $67 billion
in federal income tax deductions on owner-occupied housing
in fiscal year 1998.
Disparities in Home Ownership
The benefits of home ownership are not
distributed equally across the population. In the third quarter
of 1997, when the national home-ownership rate reached an
all-time high of 66 percent, the home-ownership rates of African-American
and Hispanic households were only 45 percent and 43 percent,
respectively (Figure 1). These differences in home-ownership
attainment contribute to large interethnic wealth disparities.
According to the Survey of Income and Program Participation
(SIPP), the median net worth of African-American and Hispanic
households was less than $5,000 in 1993, barely one-tenth
that of non-Hispanic white households.
Many factors contribute to these differing
home-ownership rates across racial and ethnic groups. Lower
household incomes make home-ownership affordability a substantial
challenge for racial and ethnic minorities. The differences
in household net worth are also a factor. They are affected
by differential access to home ownership and represent a significant
financial obstacle to home ownership for minority groups.
Discrimination in the housing and mortgage markets also contributes
to these differences. For Hispanic households, a high proportion
of recent immigrants who have not yet adapted to U.S. housing
and labor markets also contributes to lower home-ownership
rates.
Desire for home ownership does not appear
to be a factor in home-ownership rate disparities between
groups. In fact, higher proportions of African-Americans (74
percent) and Hispanics (63 percent) than whites (58 percent)
say they would be willing to take a second job to pay for
a home.
Importance of Equalizing Access to Home
Ownership
Why are the observed disparities in
home ownership so important to the housing industry? Aside
from concerns on the grounds of equity, these differences
represent substantial missed business opportunities. Harvard's
Joint Center for Housing Studies estimates that there would
have been an additional 1.8 million homeowners in the nation's
40 largest metropolitan areas in 1990 if the home-ownership
rates of immigrants and native-born African-Americans and
Hispanics were equal to the home-ownership rates of native-born
non-Hispanic whites with similar demographic and income characteristics.
This estimate represents an increase of about 7 percent over
the actual number of homeowners in these markets in 1990.
At the national level, simulations conducted
by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development suggest
that eliminating home-ownership rate differentials between
minorities and whites of the same household type and income
would increase the national home-ownership rate by the year
2000 by about 4 percent-representing almost 4 million homeowners.
Disparities in home-ownership rates
are also a major concern because demographic trends indicate
minority households and homeowners will become increasingly
important to U.S. housing markets. For example, the Census
Bureau projects Hispanic households will increase by nearly
4.5 million between 1995 and 2010 and may account for almost
30 percent of total household growth during the period. Asian
and Pacific Islanders, who currently represent only about
3 percent of all households, are projected to account for
almost 11 percent of household growth between 1995 and 2010.
Recent surveys demonstrate the importance
of minority home buyers, particularly in the first-time buyer
market. In 1997, 28.4 percent of recent first-time home buyers
were minorities in the 20 urban housing markets covered by
Chicago Title and Trust's survey of recent home buyers. Minorities
accounted for 17.8 percent of repeat home buyers in the Chicago
Title survey.
The nation's rapidly growing foreign-born
population is an important factor in the growing minority
demand for housing. Total immigration to the United States
this decade is likely to reach approximately 11 million, more
than any other decade in the nation's history. Over three-quarters
of these newcomers will be racial or ethnic minorities.
A study commissioned by the Fannie Mae
Foundation documents the increasing importance of immigrants
to housing demand growth. That work projected immigrant households
to increase by 3.6 million between 1995 and 2010, accounting
for more than one-fifth of total household growth. This is
up from an increase of about 3.1 million immigrant households
between 1980 and 1995.
The increasing importance of immigrants
will be particularly evident in the home-ownership market
as many of the immigrants who arrived in the late 1980s and
early 1990s make the transition from renter to owner. The
number of immigrant homeowners is projected to increase by
2.2 million between 1995 and 2010, compared with an increase
of 1.4 million in the preceding 15 years.
Challenges in Reaching Emerging Markets.
Minority and immigrant households face
barriers to home ownership related to low economic resources
(income and assets), discrimination in the housing and mortgage
markets, and lack of preparedness for home ownership. The
last category can include limited understanding of the home-buying
process, nontraditional methods of saving, absent or blemished
credit histories, and language barriers that complicate navigation
of the home-buying process. Among certain recent immigrant
groups, distinctive preferences for housing types and a lack
of comfort with debt and the U.S. housing finance system also
create obstacles to home ownership.
These barriers do not uniformly affect
all of the diverse households that constitute the emerging
markets for home ownership. Recognizing the distinct needs
and preferences of the individual consumer is essential to
expanding home-ownership opportunities and creating new business
opportunities. For consumers who are economically constrained,
affordable mortgage products that have higher ratios or lower
down payments may bring home ownership within reach. For those
with no formal credit record or credit blemishes, underwriting
flexibility or credit counseling might be appropriate. For
those who are unfamiliar with the U.S. home-buying process
and are not adept in English, providing consumer education
in native languages is a useful strategy. For all minority
consumers, vigilant adherence to fair housing, fair lending
and community reinvestment laws is essential to expanding
home-ownership opportunities.
Sensitivity to the diversity of home
ownership's emerging markets is particularly important in
light of rapid technological innovation in the housing-finance
industry. The development and widespread application of credit-scoring
models, for example, have the potential to enhance access
to home ownership by reducing opportunities for subjective
bias in the underwriting process and by linking underwriting
more closely with risk. This potential cannot be fulfilled
overnight, however. The performance of loans made using alternative
credit-scoring standards will need to be assessed and the
standards perfected. In the interim, lenders will need to
ensure that minority households are not adversely affected
because of nontraditional or imperfect credit histories.
Conclusion
Home ownership is a major component
of America's economic productivity and a key contributor to
household net worth. Existing low home-ownership rates combined
with significant projected household growth make minority
and recent immigrant households the emerging home-ownership
markets of the next millennium. Improving home-ownership attainment
among this emerging market segment will benefit financial
institutions, new homeowners and the national economy.
 |
| References
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (1998), "Financial
and Business Statistics 1998," Federal
Reserve Bulletin (Washington, D.C., March).
Chicago Title and Trust
Company (1998), Who's Buying Homes in America:
Chicago Title and Trust Company's 22nd Annual
Survey of Recent Home Buyers (Chicago, Chicago
Title and Trust Company).
Eggers, Frederick J., and
Paul E. Burke (1996), "Can the National Home-Ownership
Rate Be Significantly Improved by Reaching Underserved
Markets?" Housing Policy Debate
7 (First Quarter): 83–101.
Eller, T. J., and Wallace
Fraser (1995), "Asset Ownership of Households:
1993," U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current
Population Reports P70–47 (Washington,
D.C., Government Printing Office, September).
Fannie Mae Foundation (1996),
Fannie Mae National Housing Survey 1996
(Washington, D.C., June).
Fix, Michael, and Jeffrey
S. Passel (1994), Immigration and Immigrants:
Setting the Record Straight (Washington,
D.C., The Urban Institute).
Joint Center for Housing
Studies of Harvard University (1997), The
State of the Nation's Housing 1997 (Cambridge,
Mass., Joint Center for Housing Studies, October).
Joint Center for Housing
Studies of Harvard University (1995), The
State of the Nation's Housing 1995 (Cambridge,
Mass., Joint Center for Housing Studies, June).
Pitkin, John R., Dowell
Myers, Patrick A. Simmons and Isaac F. Megbolugbe
(1997), Immigration and Housing in the United
States: Trends and Prospects (Washington,
D.C., Fannie Mae Foundation, May).
Simmons, Patrick A. (forthcoming),
Housing Statistics of the United States,
2nd ed. (Washington, D.C., Bernan Associates).
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development (1995), Home Ownership
and Its Benefits, Urban Policy Brief no.
2 (Washington, D.C., August). |
 |
|
TSU Prepares Community
Development Professionals
Like other cities, Houston is
experiencing a surge in urban renewal, with more community
organizations than ever eager to become involved in the process.
Many community-based organizations originate with residents
determined to revitalize their neighborhoods. "And because
of the growth in local neighborhood revitalization,"
says Roslyn Eckel, executive director of Texas Southern University/Third
Ward Community Development Corp. (TSU/Third Ward CDC), "finding
experienced managers to direct the efforts of these groups
is a challenge."
Texas Southern University, in collaboration
with public and private partners, has accepted that challenge.
Beginning with the fall 1998 semester, students can choose
an undergraduate minor or graduate-level concentration in
community development through TSU's new Community Development
Leadership and Internship Program. The new curriculum prepares
students for revitalizing communities through both classroom
instruction and practical experience. TSU's partners in creating
the program are the TSU/Third Ward CDC—a community development
corporation created through TSU—and the Fannie Mae Foundation.
TSU and the TSU/Third Ward CDC developed
the curriculum, and Eckel is setting up the internship program.
A Fannie Mae Foundation grant will help pay a stipend for
the interns. Rodney E. Moton, a third-year student at TSU's
Thurgood Marshall School of Law and an intern at the CDC,
is helping Eckel set guidelines for the internship program.
"He is also helping me to see what
types of activities will and will not work for the program,"
explains Eckel, "and determine the types of reports we
will need from the organizations with which the interns are
placed." Felicia Jackson, the program coordinator, will
organize students' work and academic schedules.
"The Community Development Leadership
and Internship Program will emphasize developing leadership
skills for both community and economic development,"
Eckel continues. "This includes building and rehabilitating
affordable housing, land assembly, new business and commercial
development.
Classes will cover the legislative process,
urban sociology, finance, organizational management, conflict
resolution and negotiation, marketing and public relations.
Students gain practical experience in the day-to-day realities
of community development through an internship with a nonprofit
organization, government agency or financial institution involved
in community development. Interns placed with financial institutions
will learn about financing. Those working with nonprofits
and CDCs will gain experience in marketing and development,
and those placed with the city or county will be exposed to
public policy and administrative procedure for community development
initiatives.
Interns will work a maximum of 20 hours
per week for six to nine months. Organizations will be asked
to pay their intern's monthly stipend. However, for smaller
nonprofits that cannot afford to pay the whole amount, the
CDC will fund part or all of the stipend from the Fannie Mae
Foundation grant. Long term, Eckel hopes to place 20 interns
a year.
"Our goal with the internship is
to provide students with experiences in all aspects of community
development," Eckel explains.
Faculty members, community development
professionals and representatives of organizations sponsoring
interns will provide guidance and general oversight for the
program to ensure students receive the right balance of classroom
instruction and practical experience.
"Classroom instruction will help
students amass a knowledge base," Eckel says, "but
the internship will teach them what it takes to operate a
nonprofit in the real world."
IDAs Spur Savings
Asset-Building Opportunities for Low-Income
Families
In January the Central Texas Mutual
Housing Association (CTMHA) kicked off Great IDeAs, the Austin
adaptation of a program that helps low-income families save
for a brighter future.
According to Caroline Dugan, Great IDeAs
program director, plans are to help families with earnings
at least 60 percent below the median family income learn to
build assets with Individual Development Accounts (IDAs).
CTMHA established the program in partnership with Compass
Bank; the Corporation for Enterprise Development (CFED), a
Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit focused on asset building;
and Homeward Bound, an Austin nonprofit that provides money
management training and home buyer education.
Great IDeAs participants open their
savings accounts with $10 and save between $20 and $40 per
month. Each dollar they save is matched with $2 from a combination
of local and national private funds. At the highest rate of
savings, a family could have access to $6,000 at the end of
the four-year program. Participants can withdraw their contributions
from the program at any time, but they must remain for the
full term to earn the matching funds. Those participating
for the full term must use the money for one of three purposes:
buying a home, starting a business or paying for postsecondary
education.
Participants open savings accounts at
Compass Bank in Austin, and CTMHA manages the matching funds.
Homeward Bound provides the mandatory education programs on
budgeting, saving, credit and home buying.
"Our IDA program is just getting
started," comments Dugan. "But we know this approach
to building assets works because similar programs are already
seeing results."
Participants in an IDA program offered
through the Chicago Women's Self-Employment Project are cashing
out their accounts and realizing the benefits of saving. The
two-year program was developed in combination with the city
of Chicago and Harris Trust and Savings Bank. It allowed the
women, who are making the transition from welfare to work,
to accumulate an average of approximately $1,800.
Uses for the savings vary. One participant
is taking the classes required for a hairdresser's license.
Another bought a computer that will allow her to market her
janitorial service over the Internet as well as create flyers
and keep accounts. A woman who sews for people in their homes
can expand her market now that she has a car. And another
recently opened a gift shop.
But Sherri Moses, manager of the money
and assets program for the Chicago project, emphasizes that
"while having a chunk of money to invest is important,
it's the IDA program's process that is helping change lives."
CTMHA was one of 13 IDA demonstration
programs selected to receive an annual $25,000 operating grant
for up to four years from the Corporation for Enterprise Development.
CFED also provides half of the match on each IDA account,
up to $500 per year. Compass Bank has committed $40,000 per
year for four years to help CTMHA administer the program.
The bank will also provide 150 free savings accounts.
This asset-based approach to combating
poverty has something for everyone, according to Brian Anderson,
senior vice president of Compass Bank in Austin. "Where
else can someone deposit $40 and have it matched with $80
plus interest?" he asks. For its investment, the bank
gains new depositors through low-transaction savings accounts,
future business opportunities, positive public relations and
possible consideration under the Community Reinvestment Act.
The community benefits from the stabilizing effect of families
becoming home or business owners or increasing their human
capital through higher education.
"It's a win-win-win situation for
families in the program, the community and the bank,"
says Anderson.
Did You Know...?
Fed Board Requests Comment on Regulations
The Federal Reserve Board has requested
comment on a comprehensive review of two of its consumer protection
regulations: Regulation B, Equal Credit Opportunity, and Regulation
C, Home Mortgage Disclosure. Under the Board's Regulatory
Planning and Review Program, the review will seek to clarify,
simplify and update both regulations as well as reduce regulatory
burden. The Board must receive comments by May 29.
To gather information necessary for
this review and ensure the participation of interested parties,
the Board is soliciting comment on several specific issues,
while also soliciting comment generally on potential revisions
to the regulations.
Additional information is available
from Notice 98-32. Please contact the Public Affairs Department
at 800-333-4460, ext. 5254 for a copy of the notice.
| About Banking
and Community Perspectives
Perspectives
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
Community Affairs Office
P.O. Box 655906
Dallas, Texas 75265-5906
Gloria Vasquez Brown
Vice President |
Nancy C. Vickrey
Community Affairs Officer |
Ariel D. Cisneros
Community Affairs Specialist |
Jim V. Foster
Community Affairs Specialist |
Bobbie K. Salgado
Houston Branch
Community Affairs Specialist |
|
The views expressed are
those of the authors and should not be attributed
to the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas or the Federal
Reserve System. Articles may be reprinted on the
condition that the source is credited and a copy
is provided to the Community Affairs Office. |
|
|