|
June 2006
The Texas economy continued its
upward momentum in April. The Dallas Fed’s Texas
Coincident Index—a business-cycle index of
current economic indicators—rose at a 2.8 percent
annualized rate during the month (Chart 1).
Year-to-date the index has increased at a solid pace
of 3.1 percent (annualized).
Chart 1
|
According to data provided by
the Texas Workforce Commission with seasonal and other adjustments by the Dallas Fed [3], Texas employment rose a modest 0.4
percent (annualized) in April (see table). The weak
monthly growth conflicts with anecdotal reports that
suggest the economy continues to expand at a strong
pace. Given higher-than-expected upward revisions to
2005 employment data, along with positive anecdotal
information from the Dallas Fed’s Beige
Book, it appears unlikely that the state’s
economy is slowing significantly. Since April 2005,
Texas employment has risen 2.5 percent.
Texas’ Major Metros
Austin’s
economy continued to grow at a vigorous pace in April,
with its business-cycle
index increasing 4.4 percent. The metro’s
economy added 700 jobs (1.2 percent annualized) during
the month, with most of the gains concentrated in the
trade, transportation and utilities sector. Additionally,
residential and retail building activity continued to
buoy employment gains in the construction sector, and
anecdotal reports suggested increased venture capital
funding in the metro. Year-to-date, Austin has recorded
the strongest rate of job growth (2.4 percent) among
Texas’ major metros.
Despite an April slowdown, the
Dallas economy has witnessed marked
expansion in 2006, with job gains rivaling Houston’s
(12,800 jobs, a 2 percent pace) and business-cycle growth
of 2.2 percent. Since April 2005, the metro’s
business-cycle index
has risen 3.6 percent. An April dip in the index (-0.5
percent) was due to reported employment losses (across
all sectors) of 2,200 in April, following gains of 6,700
in March. However, anecdotal reports suggest the metro
will resume the stronger pace of growth seen earlier
in the year. The professional and business services
sector is reportedly witnessing strong job growth, and
business contacts in the real estate industry continue
to see increased in-migration and relocations.
Fort Worth’s
economy continues to expand at a steady pace. The metro’s
business-cycle index
rose 1.7 percent in April, with employment growth of
1.0 percent. Job gains came mainly from the service
sector during the month (trade, transportation and utilities,
financial activities, and educational and health services),
while goods sector employment was basically flat. Prospects
for Fort Worth’s economy are positive. Population
growth is robust, and several companies in insurance-related
industries are reportedly relocating or opening operations
in the area. For the year, the metro has added 4,700
jobs.
The Houston economy
remains robust. The metro’s business-cycle
index rose at an annualized rate of 3.1 percent
in April and employment increased by 2,000. The energy
industry continues to drive the local economy. Still,
other sectors, including construction, are also contributing
to economic growth. In particular, retail construction
is at a record high. In addition, the educational and
health service sector recorded strong job gains, reflecting,
in part, the increase in permanent population from Louisiana
(according to the latest estimates about 25,000 people
in Harris County alone).
San Antonio’s
economy expanded at a solid pace in April as its business-cycle
index rose 2.3 percent. The index was boosted by
job gains of 800, many coming from the service sector.
Employment increased in the financial activities sector
as Washington Mutual began hiring telephone bankers
at its regional operations center. Robust residential
and commercial building activity spurred construction
employment during the month. Moreover, manufacturing
payrolls rose in April, as Toyota and its suppliers
continued preparing for the fall opening of the Tundra
plant. For the year, the metro has posted a job gain
of 2,600.
Texas’ Major Border Metros
Brownsville’s
economy moderated in April as the metro’s business-cycle
index rose at an annualized rate of 1.0 percent
(Chart 2). This compares with growth of 3.2
percent since April 2005. Employment increased by 100
in April. Retail and commercial construction remain
strong, boosted by population growth. For the year,
the metro has added 800 jobs.
Chart 2
|
El Paso's business-cycle
index slowed to 0.9 percent growth in April as employment
dipped 0.5 percent. Job gains in the sectors of trade,
transportation and public utilities, professional and
business services and government were offset by losses
in manufacturing, information, and leisure and hospitality.
Despite the April slowdown, El Paso’s economy
is expected to resume the more robust growth recorded
over the past year. The metro’s business-cycle
index has risen 3.7 percent since April 2005. The economy
is expected to be fueled by growing manufacturing activity
in the sister city of Ciudad Juárez and by the
continued expansion at Ft. Bliss.
Laredo’s
economy remains strong. The metro’s business-cycle
index rose 4.1 percent in April with employment
increasing 3.0 percent. Laredo’s economy benefits
from its designation as the gateway for land-borne United
States–Mexico trade. Although there are fewer
maquiladoras associated with Laredo than other border
metros, cross-border trade stimulates warehouse and
transportation employment. The leisure and hospitality
industry remains strong as restaurants move from crime-ridden
Nuevo Laredo to Laredo. In addition, hotel occupancy
is on the rise.
McAllen’s
economy moderated in April. The metro’s business-cycle
index rose just 0.9 percent during the month, a
result of lackluster job growth (0.6 percent). The real
estate and retail sectors remain strong; however, a
drought has reduced the metro’s agricultural production.
Year-to-date figures suggest the economy remains on
track despite the monthly slowdown. So far in 2006,
the McAllen business-cycle index has expanded at a rate
of 3.7 percent, with employment growth registering a
strong 3.8 percent.
| Texas Metro Employment and Unemployment,
Seasonally Adjusted |
|
| Notes
- All growth rates are annualized unless
otherwise noted.
- For a definition of the Texas Coincident
Index, see Data Basics, Data
Definitions. For more detail about
the Texas metro business-cycle indexes
see,
"Dallas Fed Introduces Business-Cycle
Indexes for Texas Metros," Southwest
Economy, May/June 2005.
- The employment data used in this analysis have been benchmarked to TWC's fourth quarter 2005 CEW data and seasonally adjusted by the Dallas Fed. For more information
about early benchmarking data please see,
“Getting
a Jump on Texas Employment Revisions,”
Southwest Economy, November/December
2005.
- For more information regarding the importance
of seasonal adjustment of economic data,
see Data Basics, "Seasonally
Adjusting Data." For more information
about the procedure used to seasonally
adjust metro-level data, see "Reassessing
Texas Employment Growth,"
Southwest Economy, July/August 1993.
For additional
information or questions, please contact
Laila Assanie at (214) 922-5191. |
|
|