| RELATED
ARTICLES |
 |
| "Beating
Border Barriers in the U.S.–Mexico Trade,"
Southwest Economy, Sept./Oct. 2001
(Text
or PDF) |
 |
| "Transportation
Infrastructure and the Border Economy",
The Border Economy, June 2001 (Text
or PDF) |
 |
| "Border
Bottlenecks Hamper Trade," Southwest
Economy, Issue 5, 1998 (Text
or PDF) |
|
|
|
Global Economy
Beating
Border Barriers in U.S.–Mexico Trade
Pia
Orrenius, Keith Phillips and Benjamin Blackburn take a brief look
at cross-border trucking, the problems associated with it and measures
that could improve border trade efficiency.
Over the past
15 years, U.S. trade with Mexico has increased 400 percent—from
$48 billion to $239 billion—yet neither Mexico nor the United States
has made the adjustments necessary to handle the growing traffic.
Unlike U.S. commerce with any other nation but Canada, U.S.–Mexico
trade is mostly truck trade. And whether truckers use busy Texas,
California or Arizona crossings, they face congestion and long waits,
usually associated with government inspections and customs processing.

Cross-Border
Trucking Restrictions
Restrictions on cross-border trucking add to the problems. Because
the United States refuses to open its border to Mexican long-haul
trucks—despite commitments it made under NAFTA—shippers have to
rely on short-haul trucks to shuttle cargo across the border. The
short-haul trucks haul in one direction only, clogging bridges,
roads and inspection stations with empty trucks. A March 2000 U.S.
General Accounting Office (GAO) study notes that 47 percent of the
3.6 million containers that crossed the border from Mexico in fiscal
year 1998 were empty.[1] The GAO study also points out that government
officials must process empty trucks as they do full ones to ensure
compliance with U.S. laws and regulations.

Transactions
Costs and the Direction of Trade
On the Southwest border, the extent of transactions costs depends
on the direction of trade. In general, northbound trade faces more
costs in the form of various U.S. government inspections. Southbound
trade is most encumbered by Mexican customs broker practices—the
warehousing, extensive paperwork, payment of duties and transfer
of goods onto short-haul carriers. In both north- and southbound
trade, clearing international freight implies many steps. Total
shipping costs are the sum of duties, broker and customs user fees,
freight forwarding and short- and long-haul service costs, bridge
tolls and wait times for inspections.
Inspection
Process Inefficiencies
The sheer volume of commercial trucks has overwhelmed government
agencies charged with inspections and exacerbated inefficiencies
in the inspection processes. The lack of coordination among agencies
within countries, as well as across countries, stands in the way
of reducing transactions costs shippers face. Agencies in both the
United States and Mexico generally do not share facilities, but
operate at different locations and keep different hours. Depending
on the type of load, trucks pass through customs, agriculture, drug,
immigration and safety inspections. Faced with 50 to 100 percent
increases in commercial vehicle traffic since 1994, government funding
for additional staff and facilities has fallen behind. Processing
is still paper based, as agencies have been slow to adopt new "intelligent
transportation" technologies that could drastically reduce inspection
times.
Cooperation
and Technology Offer a Partial Solution
The cumbersome processing of northbound shipments could be improved
by better cooperation among U.S. governmental agencies and greater
use of available technology. As a partial solution, several transportation
research institutes have recommended a prototype border facility
that would provide electronic preclearing of northbound trucks and
their cargo and improve coordination among U.S. agencies at the
border.
Solving the Empty Truck Problem
Then there’s the empty truck problem. The requirement
that Mexican customs brokers must preclear trucks coming into Mexico—and
the fact that they do so on the U.S. side of the border—is an important
cause of short-haul trucking (drayage) on the border. The NAFTA
trucking agreement—allowing Mexican trucks to transport goods directly
into the United States (direct lining) and likewise for U.S. trucks
into Mexico—would be an important improvement. It would increase
the incidence of direct lining and reduce the demand for drayage,
storage and warehousing. The reduction in short-haul carriers would
cut costs to shippers and, since they normally do not backhaul,
would reduce traffic and congestion on the border by lowering the
number of empty trucks.
|
Pia
M. Orrenius is a senior economist at the Federal Reserve
Bank of Dallas; Keith Phillips is a senior economist
and Benjamin Blackburn is a research assistant at the
San Antonio Branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
NOTE:
| 1. |
See
"U.S.–Mexico Border: Better Planning, Coordination
Needed to Handle Growing Commercial Traffic,"
U.S. General Accounting Office, March 2000, p.
4. The report can be accessed on the Internet
at http://www.gao.gov/archive/2000/ns00025.pdf
|
SUGGESTED
CITATION:
Blackburn,
Benjamin, Pia M. Orrenius and Keith Phillips (2001),
"Beating Border Barriers in U.S.–Mexico Trade,"
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Expand Your Insight,
September 10, http://www.dallasfed.org/eyi/global/0109border.html
|
|
About
EYI | Global Economy
| U.S. Economy |
Regional Economy
| Free Enterprise
| Money & Banking
| Technology
Federal Reserve Bank of
Dallas | FRB
Dallas Publications
|