| RELATED
ARTICLES |
 |
| "California's
Electricity Woes: A Vision of the Future?"
In Depth, March 2001 (Text
or PDF)
|
 |
| "California
Is Giving Electricity Deregulation a Bad Name,"
Southwest Economy, Jan./Feb. 2001 (Text
or PDF) |
|
|
|
U.S. Economy
A Wake-Up Call in California
Stephen P. A. Brown looks at the restructuring of California's electricity market
and what other states are doing to create freer markets.
Since mid-2000,
California has experienced a considerable number of problems with
its electricity market, including fluctuating prices and shortages.
California's electricity woes give us a reason to take pause and
consider the future of U.S. electricity markets and of energy policies
in general. Electricity is an important part of the U.S. energy
infrastructureaccounting for more than one-third of U.S. energy
consumption. If other states experienced problems with their electricity
markets similar to those in California, the effects would be felt
throughout the economy.
California's
Restructuring
The restructuring of California's electricity markets did not provide
much deregulation.
California...
- opened its
generation markets to competition, but the state did not permit
the free entry of new power plants.
- retained
regulation of transmission and distribution as is prototypical,
but a public agency assumed control of some transmission lines.
- did not open
up marketing/sales to competition.
- froze retail
electricity prices.
- banned the
use of long-term market instruments and forced all power to be
transacted through a daily spot market operated by a public agency.
In short, California
did not create a transition to a free electricity market, and its
restructuring should not be considered deregulation. In addition,
the reforms California has made since late last year have done little
to further deregulate its electricity markets.
A
Wake-Up Call?
In some sense, California's electricity woes should serve as a wake-up
call for thinking about the direction of U.S. electricity markets
and energy policy. The U.S. Department of Energy forecasts that
U.S. electricity consumption will grow by more than 30 percent over
the next two decades, while the use of natural gas to produce electricity
will increase by nearly 60 percent. That forecast calls for a much
stronger growth rate in the use of natural gas to produce electricity
than occurred over the past 30 years.

The infrastructure
to produce the additional electricity and supply the additional
natural gas does not currently exist. If people in other states
take the same attitude toward the development of new electric power
facilities and natural gas pipelines as Californians seem to have
taken over the past 20 years, electricity will be relatively scarce,
and either higher prices or shortages of electricity will result.

Electricity
Market Restructuring in Other States
Most states progressing toward a restructuring of their electricity
markets are creating freer markets than California has. Of the 24
states and the District of Columbia that have deregulated or have
taken concrete steps toward deregulation, the eight states shown
in green seem to meet the criteria for a successful transition to
a free market. The 11 states shown in yellow are entering deregulation
in pretty good shape. Nine of these states have price caps but sufficient
instate generating capacity. Connecticut and Virginia do not have
price caps but do import significant quantities of electricity.
The three states shown in orange and the District of Columbia are
in only slightly better shape than California. They import significant
quantities of electricity. In addition, Maryland, Delaware and the
District of Columbia have price caps, and New York has other impediments
to freely functioning electricity markets.
Only Oregon,
shown in red along with California, seems to be freeing its electricity
markets as little as California. Oregon imports significant quantities
of electricity, is not allowing for entry into marketing and sales,
is retaining regulated prices and discourages market-making activities.
The other 26 states, shown in gray, do not currently have concrete
plans for restructuring and are in a position to learn from those
preceding them.
Electricity
Market Restructuring in Texas
Texas is in the process of restructuring electricity markets in most areas
of the state. Restructuring will be completely phased in by the
end of 2001. As Texas approaches its restructuring, success seems
very likely.
Texas is entering
deregulation with sufficient generation capacity (and fuel supplies).
It is opening electricity generation to competition with the free
entry of new power plants and private contracts. Marketing and sales
to consumers will be opened to competition. Electricity prices will
be free to move. Texas is allowing a range of market instruments,
including long-term contracts and spot sales. It is also encouraging
private market-making activities.
|
Stephen P. A. Brown is director of energy economics and microeconomic policy analysis at the Federal
Reserve Bank of Dallas.
SUGGESTED
CITATION:
Brown,
Stephen P. A. (2001), "A Wake-Up Call in California,"
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Expand Your Insight,
March 1, http://www.dallasfed.org/eyi/usecon/0103elec.html
|
|
About
EYI | Global Economy
| U.S. Economy |
Regional Economy
| Free Enterprise
| Money & Banking
| Technology
Federal Reserve Bank of
Dallas | FRB
Dallas Publications
|