|Volume 13, Issue 1, 2013||Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas|
Receive e-mail announcing the latest
Alternative Refund Settlement Products May Compromise Asset-Building Goals
High-cost, short-term loans such as the refund anticipation loan (RAL) have historically been popular with low-income filers. RALs are based on the taxpayer’s expected refund and are issued at the time of filing. They allow the taxpayer to receive an anticipated refund earlier, in the form of a loan. These products have often been associated with high prices and extra filing costs. Nationwide, 7.2 million taxpayers received RALs in 2009, and 87 percent of those were low income.
For the 2011 tax filing season, the IRS ceased providing the debt indicator that contained information about outstanding federal debts owed by filers that would prevent them from receiving their full tax refund. Without this indicator, tax preparers and associated financial institutions may not know if filers will be able to repay their RALs. As a result, the share of Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) recipients who requested RALs declined from one-third in tax year 2006 to about 5 percent in tax year 2010 across Texas. Figure 1 shows the breakdown by county and tax year.
Although use of RALs is down, some entities continue to offer them, and related products are on the market as well. The refund anticipation check (RAC), for instance, allows filers to have the cost of fees deducted from their refund rather than paid up front. However, this service costs an extra $25 to $55 and does not speed up the receipt of refunds. The use of RACs has increased in recent years (Figure 2).
The terms and conditions of these products can be difficult to understand, and the costs associated with them can take a chunk out of low-income families' refunds, leaving them less able to take advantage of tax-time asset-building opportunities.
—Wenhua Di and Emily Ryder
e-Perspectives, Volume 13, Issue 1, 2013