|
Maquiladoras:
Impact on Texas Border Cities
Lucinda Vargas
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
June 2001
Mexico's maquiladora industry has become
an increasingly significant component of the Mexican economy
as well as an important part of U.S. corporate strategy in
achieving competitively priced goods in the world marketplace.
[1] Maquiladoras are largely concentrated in Mexican cities
that border the United States. Since Texas encompasses about
half the U.S.–Mexico border, maquiladoras are especially
relevant to the state's economy.
To assess the maquiladoras' importance
to the border economy, we must first understand how maquiladoras
affect Mexico. This article looks at the maquiladora industry's
performance in Mexico and then the industry's significance
for Texas border cities.
Mexico's Northern Border
The maquiladora industry has boosted
job creation, exports and foreign exchange in Mexico. During
1983–2000, annual growth in maquiladora employment and
exports averaged almost 14 percent and 21 percent, respectively.
At about 1.3 million workers, maquiladora employment represented
29 percent of Mexico's manufacturing jobs in 2000, up from
slightly more than 7 percent in 1983. Further, maquiladora
exports, at $79.4 billion in 2000, made up almost half Mexico's
total exports (47.7 percent) and the majority of its manufacturing
exports (54.7 percent). Maquiladoras are Mexico's top source
of foreign exchange, netting almost $18 billion last year.
Table 1 summarizes the maquiladora industry's key indicators
for 2000.
| Table 1 |
| Maquiladora Industry Key Indicators,
2000 |
|
|
2000 |
Change
from 1999 |
| Plants |
3,590 |
8.9% |
| Employment |
1,285,007 |
12.7% |
| Raw
materials (billions) |
|
|
| Imported |
$53.5 |
19.8% |
| Domestic
|
$1.8 |
38.5% |
| Total
|
$55.3 |
20.3% |
| Value
added (billions) |
$17.8 |
32.4% |
| Exports
(billions) |
$79.4 |
24.3% |
|
| SOURCES: Federal Reserve Bank of
Dallas El Paso Branch, with data from Instituto
Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática;
export data are from Banco de México. |
The maquiladora industry also has contributed
significantly to Mexico's regional, technological, human capital
and infrastructure development, as illustrated by what is
happening at the border.
Regional Development
In 2000, Mexican border cities represented
62 percent of overall maquiladora employment (nearly 797,000
workers) and 70 percent of production ($50 billion). The two
locations with the highest concentration of maquiladora investment
are Ciudad Juárez (across from
El Paso) and Tijuana (across from San
Diego). Together, these two cities in 2000 represented 34
percent of Mexico's total maquiladora employment, with more
than 249,500 workers in Ciudad Juárez
and over 187,300 workers in Tijuana.
Before the maquiladora program's implementation,
cities along Mexico's northern border had among the highest
unemployment rates in the country, typically in double digits.
Because of the industry's settlement in these cities and its
consistent record of employment growth, these locations now
have among the nation's lowest unemployment rates. In fact,
maquiladoras have become so important to the border that in
Ciudad Juárez, for example,
the majority of all jobs in 2000—60 percent—came from the
maquiladora sector. Moreover, the overwhelming majority of
the city's manufacturing jobs—87 percent—were attributable
to maquiladora companies last year.
Technology and Human Capital
When Mexico's maquiladora program began
in 1965, most companies were basically assembly operations
requiring unskilled labor. The industry has evolved, and factories
now use more sophisticated production techniques and require
more skilled labor. For example, in 2000, technicians represented
12 percent of maquiladora employment, compared with 8.8 percent
in 1975. In addition, the skill level of the maquiladoras'
largest labor component—direct line workers—has been upgraded
to suit newer technologies. [2]
Mexico's maquiladora companies today
boast state-of-the-art production technology. Research and
design centers are now part of the maquiladora landscape as
well. A key example is the Delphi Mexico Technical Center
in Ciudad Juárez. This center,
which until April 1999 was part of the General Motors Corp.
maquiladora production infrastructure, is dedicated to the
research and design of auto parts used by the world's top
auto producers. Considered the most advanced of 31 such Delphi
centers around the world, it employs almost 2,000 workers,
most of whom are engineers. The center opened in April 1995
and within four years had doubled capacity.
The technological evolution of the maquiladora
industry would not have been possible without the required
professional and skilled personnel. This increasingly skilled
workforce comes, in large part, from the maquiladoras themselves
through training and development at all levels. Typically,
training includes in-house programs as well as visits to the
company's manufacturing facilities outside Mexico. Maquiladoras
also sponsor vocational programs at local technical centers
and trade schools to ensure that workers' skills match those
in demand by the industry.
A recent example of the maquiladora
industry's efforts at educating its work-force is the Center
for High Technology Training (Centro de Educación
en Alta Tecnología, or CENALTEC), established
in Ciudad Juárez in March 2000.
This center, created through a collaborative effort between
maquiladora companies in the area and the state and federal
governments, incorporates state-of-the-art infrastructure
in training highly skilled technicians in manufacturing specialties.
Companies award scholarships to the center's two-year training
programs.
Infrastructure Development
Though the maquiladora industry is growing
at more dynamic rates in the interior of Mexico, the border's
appeal is still high among new investors, and, thus, growth
at the border has been sustained. For example, border employment
growth averaged 7.8 percent per year during the 1990s, while
the corresponding figure for the interior was 17 percent.
However, since the border's employment base (nearly 797,000
workers) is higher than the interior's (488,200 workers),
job growth of almost 8 percent on the border is still impressive.
Moreover, during the second half of the 1990s, when the entire
maquiladora industry rebounded as a result of the peso devaluation,
border employment averaged double-digit growth on a yearly
basis (11.1 percent). [3]
One outcome of the border's dynamic
maquiladora growth has been infrastructure bottlenecks in
the region, which have been only partly alleviated by the
industry's movement to the interior. The border's growth has
led to such problems as insufficient or inadequate housing
for maquiladora workers. Maquiladora companies are teaming
with the Mexican government to build adequate and affordable
housing for workers and to assist them with financing. Delphi
Automotive launched the first such program in 1997. Other
large maquiladora companies have followed with similar programs.
Maquiladoras also have participated
in improving the infrastructure of their border locations.
For example, in Ciudad Juárez,
maquiladoras make annual contributions to the city's budget
that are targeted for different purposes, such as city road
improvements. [4] Also, maquiladoras have financially supported
improvements to certain commercial bridges, which are critical
to their daily production shipments across the border. [5]
Texas Border Cities
The Texas border is host to the majority
of the maquiladoras along the U.S.–Mexico boundary.
Table 2 lists the cities across from Texas with a maquiladora
presence and outlines their individual participation in the
industry. In 2000, these cities' combined share of total maquiladora
employment and production equaled 35.4 percent and 40.4 percent,
respectively. Within the border region, their combined share
represented the majority—57.1 percent in employment and 57.5
percent in production. This is equivalent to a maquiladora
industry employing more than 455,000 workers in 713 plants
and with a total production value of nearly $29 billion.
| Table 2 |
| Maquiladora Industry Along the Texas–Mexico
Border, 2000 |
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Plants |
308 |
8 |
56
|
38 |
54
|
117
|
13
|
119
|
| Percent of total |
8.6 |
.2 |
1.6 |
1.1 |
1.5 |
3.3 |
.4 |
3.3 |
| Percent of border |
14.3 |
.4 |
2.6 |
1.8 |
2.5 |
5.4 |
.6 |
5.5 |
| Employment |
249,509 |
967 |
32,130 |
14,546 |
22,603 |
66,091 |
3,287 |
66,023 |
| Percent of total |
19.4 |
.1 |
2.5 |
1.1 |
1.8 |
5.1 |
.3 |
5.1 |
| Percent
of border |
31.3 |
.1 |
4.0 |
1.8 |
2.8 |
8.3 |
.4 |
8.3 |
| Raw
materials Imports (millions) |
$12,785 |
$25 |
$1,099 |
$329 |
$1,253 |
$3,894 |
$104 |
$3,254 |
| Percent of total |
23.9 |
.0 |
2.1 |
.6 |
2.3 |
7.3 |
.2 |
6.1 |
| Percent of border |
32.6 |
.1 |
2.8 |
.8 |
3.2 |
9.9 |
.3 |
8.3 |
| Gross production
(millions) |
$16,191 |
$37 |
$1,386 |
$468 |
$1,648 |
$4,826 |
$145 |
$4,065 |
| Percent
of total |
22.7 |
.1 |
1.9 |
.7 |
2.3 |
6.8 |
.2 |
5.7 |
| Percent
of border |
32.4 |
.1 |
2.8 |
.9 |
3.3 |
9.7 |
.3 |
8.1 |
|
| SOURCES: Federal Reserve Bank of
Dallas El Paso Branch, with data from Instituto
Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática. |
Texas border cities have reaped important
benefits from their maquiladora neighbors. Transportation
and customs services have flourished on the U.S. side of the
border because of the maquiladora industry's large trade flows
through border ports of entry (Table 3). These companies
typically maintain distribution facilities and administrative
offices on the U.S. side, stimulating the industrial real
estate sector of Texas border cities. Maquiladoras also create
jobs for the U.S. border in the legal, accounting and financial
professions. Even the hotel, car rental and restaurant industries
profit from maquiladoras because corporate personnel and other
maquiladora visitors usually stay and eat on the U.S. side.
[6]
| Table 3 |
U.S.–Mexico Trade by Texas Border
Port of Entry, 2000
(millions of U.S. dollars) |
|
|
Exports
to Mexico |
Imports
from Mexico |
Total
trade |
| Laredo |
39,283.6 |
45,536.3 |
84,819.9 |
| El
Paso |
17.520.4 |
22,810.6 |
40,331.0 |
| Hidalgo |
6,221.9
|
6,888.5
|
13,110.4
|
| Brownsville-Cameron |
6,374.1
|
6,049.5
|
12,423.6
|
| Eagle
Pass |
4,283.5
|
3,041.1
|
7,324.6
|
| Del
Rio |
1,156.1
|
1,282.6
|
2,438.7
|
| Presidio |
112.8
|
153.0
|
265.8
|
| Rio
Grande City |
118.8
|
116.6
|
235.4
|
| Progreso |
129.0
|
15.6
|
144.6
|
| Roma |
92.4
|
16.1
|
108.5
|
| Fabens |
.9 |
.0 |
.9 |
| Total
Texas ports |
75,293
|
85,910
|
161,203
|
Total
all
border ports |
95,692
|
120,409
|
216,101
|
| Texas
share |
78.7%
|
71.3%
|
74.6%
|
|
| SOURCES: Texas Center for Border
Economic and Enterprise Development, Texas A&M International
University, with data from U.S. Department of Commerce. |
Beyond the service industry, border
manufacturing is increasingly benefiting from maquiladoras.
Industry suppliers have been expanding or relocating their
operations to cities such as El Paso to be close to their
customer bases across the border. For instance, in 1999, there
were 40 plastic injection molding companies in El Paso, employing
more than 4,100 workers. These companies mostly serve the
maquiladora industry in Ciudad Juárez in sectors that
range from automotive and computers to medical and consumer
goods. Moreover, employment in plastics manufacturing in El
Paso—up 101 percent since 1990—is highly skilled. From 1990
through 1999, for example, this sector's hourly compensation
was, on average, nearly 21 percent higher than that of the
apparel sector, El Paso's largest and most established manufacturing
sector. The success of plastic injection molding in the area
is also evidenced by the impressive growth of plastic product
exports through El Paso, which equaled $806 million in 1999,
up more than 700 percent from the 1993 level.
The employment link between maquiladoras
and U.S. border cities is not exclusive to El Paso. Research
has found a strong positive correlation between U.S. border
city employment and export (maquiladora) production in the
neighboring Mexican border city. [7] Further, results show
that for larger border cities, such as El Paso, the employment
effect is strongest in manufacturing, while for smaller border
cities, such as Laredo, the employment effects are strongest
for the transportation and wholesale trade industries.
Indeed, two of the three other major
border cities in Texas—Brownsville and McAllen—are home to
plastic injection molding suppliers that cater to the maquiladora
industry. In addition to El Paso's 40 plastic injection molding
companies, Brownsville has 11 and McAllen has 13. [8] Laredo,
which has a minimal manufacturing presence, is the exception,
with no suppliers in this category. [9] Chart 1 shows the
growth trend of the rubber and miscellaneous plastics manufacturing
subsector in all four cities for 1990–99. The only city
that shows a decline is Laredo.
Skilled-Labor Bottlenecks
Keeping El Paso from taking full advantage
of the maquiladora supplier market is an insufficient pool
of skilled workers. Though plastics manufacturers in El Paso
have used in-house training to develop their workers into
skilled technicians, a broader effort is required to generate
a continuous supply of skilled labor. Recognizing this need,
the city has implemented various programs to train workers
not only in plastic-injection-molding techniques but also
in metal stamping, tool and die, and other areas that complement
the manufacturing processes of maquiladora suppliers. El Paso
also has received multiple worker retraining grants as a result
of worker displacements in the city's apparel industry (see
box titled "El Paso, NAFTA and Worker Retraining"). The goal
is to transform an unskilled labor pool into the skilled workers
sought by the industries coming to town in pursuit of the
maquiladora market across the border.
The state's other border cities face
similar situations. Research on maquiladora market opportunities
for border cities in South Texas shows that maquiladoras are
willing to enhance their base of local suppliers. The companies'
savings in inventory and transportation costs are obvious.
However, one bottleneck is a workforce with inadequate skills.
[10]
Lucrative Market
El Paso has carved an important niche
in serving the maquiladora industry, especially in plastic
injection molding. This demonstrates that border cities such
as El Paso—which have traditionally lacked a sophisticated
industrial base—can nonetheless attract investments using
their formidable advantage with the lucrative maquiladora
market. The total maquiladora inputs or components market
in Ciudad Juárez alone was worth
nearly $13 billion in 2000. The industry's components market
along the Texas border—from Juárez
to Matamoros—was a massive $23 billion
in 2000, roughly 42 percent of the maquiladora industry's
total components market ($55.3 billion).
Maquiladoras import 97 percent of the
components they use. And 80 to 85 percent of these come from
the United States, mostly from states not bordering Mexico.
[11] As more suppliers seek to move closer to their maquiladora
customer base, the border stands to benefit. The border's
traditionally high unemployment rate translates into an available
labor pool in the region. [12] However, this workforce has
to be transformed into the skilled labor that high-tech maquiladora
suppliers need. Should this happen, we could see industrialization
of the border at a time when the rest of the country is de-industrializing,
precisely because of the lack of available workers. [13]
For Texas border cities, the presence
of maquiladoras across the border translates into more and
better-paying jobs. In short, maquiladoras help the Texas
border region move up the economic ladder.
El Paso,
NAFTA and Worker Retraining
Between 1994 and 2000, a
total of 330,107 U.S. workers were certified to
receive benefits under the NAFTA Transitional
Adjustment Assistance (TAA) program. This program
was created in 1994 through NAFTA to help workers
affected by increased imports from Mexico and
Canada or by shifts in U.S. production to those
countries as a result of the agreement. El Paso
has the largest number of workers certified under
this program—13,450 through 2000. Nearly 8,000
of these workers (more than 59 percent) were displaced
from El Paso's apparel industry.
While many point to the
TAA figures as evidence of NAFTA's negative impact
on El Paso, NAFTA also has created jobs for the
city. Unfortunately, because no accounting system
equivalent to the TAA tracks the job-growth side
of the equation, an assessment of NAFTA's net
impact on El Paso's employment is not possible.
Since NAFTA's passage, however, El Paso has registered
a net gain in employment—30,733 new jobs—or growth
of almost 14 percent between 1993 and 2000. [14]
NAFTA reasonably could be credited with some of
this job growth in areas servicing the increased
trade through the border resulting from NAFTA.
[15] This implies new jobs in transportation and
distribution services as well as in professional
services such as legal, accounting, financial
and customs brokerage. Finally, the unemployment
rate has been on a downward trend in El Paso since
NAFTA started, as it has for Texas' other major
border cities (see chart ).
Interestingly, El Paso's
No. 1 position in NAFTA TAA certifications in
the United States has placed the city in the national
spotlight, attracting funding toward retraining
programs for trade-displaced workers. For example,
the U.S. Department of Labor awarded El Paso,
through the city's Proactive Reemployment Project
or PREP, a $45 million grant to retrain some 4,000
workers, most of them former garment industry
employees. This grant is the largest of its kind
ever awarded to a city by the Labor Department.
In 1998, project ARRIBA (Advanced Retraining and
Redevelopment Initiative in Border Areas) was
launched in El Paso with a state grant of $1 million.
ARRIBA secured additional funding totaling more
than $1.5 million from the governor's Discretionary
Fund ($600,000), the North American Development
Bank ($450,000), El Paso County ($250,000) and
El Paso Empowerment Zone Corp. ($211,297).
Last year the El Paso
Chamber of Commerce opened the Center for Worker
Preparedness with a $1.4 million grant from the
U.S. Department of Commerce and a $1 million interest-free
loan from the North American Development Bank.
In addition, local educational and training institutions
have received funding for programs such as the
El Paso Manufacturing Training Consortium at El
Paso Community College. Thus, if NAFTA is to be
cited as the cause of much worker displacement
in El Paso, it also has contributed toward an
improved worker-training infrastructure.
|
|
 |
| About the Author
Vargas is a senior economist
at the El Paso Branch of the Federal Reserve Bank
of Dallas.
Notes
- For an overview of the maquiladora industry
and its importance for the U.S. and Mexican
economies, see "The Binational Importance of
the Maquiladora Industry," Southwest Economy,
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Issue 6, November/December
1999, pp. 1–5.
- Direct labor represented 80.9 percent of
total maquiladora employment in 2000. Although
the majority of these workers (55.2 percent)
were female, this share is down considerably
from 78.3 percent in 1975. In fact, in the industry's
top two locations—Ciudad Juárez
and Tijuana—females make
up just under half (49.7 percent) of the direct-labor
workforce, putting them in the minority. .
- Because maquiladora companies have dollar-denominated
budgets but their costs are in pesos, the overnight
impact of any peso devaluation is essentially
a reduction in their peso-based costs. Maquiladoras
have therefore responded to devaluations in
Mexico by substantially expanding their operations.
- According to the Treasury Department of the
city of Juárez,
the voluntary contribution that each maquiladora
in Juárez gives
to the city each year, on a voluntary basis,
is $15 per employee and is based on each company's
employment base at year-end. Not all maquiladoras
contribute, but a majority (54 percent based
on employment) do. Last year, maquiladora contributions
to the city of Juárez
equaled $1.6 million.
- For the improvements to the Bridge of the
Americas between El Paso and Juárez
in 1996–98, for example, various private-sector
entities in Juárez—including the maquiladora
association—contributed some $7 million.
- Delphi Automotive, until April 1999 a part
of General Motors Corp., has conducted annual
studies since 1996 on the total estimated economic
impact on El Paso of Delphi's operations in
Ciudad Juárez.
Beyond including elements such as what the company
pays the city in property taxes for distribution
and warehousing facilities, the study also includes
expenditures in El Paso on hotels, restaurants
and rental cars by corporate visitors to Delphi
plants. In June 1999, Delphi's total (direct
and indirect) economic impact on El Paso was
estimated at above $285 million.
- The overall elasticity —or responsiveness—of
U.S. border-city employment with respect to
Mexican export production is between 0.11 and
0.2. In other words, a 10 percent rise in export
manufacturing in a Mexican border city leads
to a 1.1 to 2 percent rise in employment in
the neighboring U.S. border city. See Gordon
H. Hanson, "U.S.–Mexico Integration and
Regional Economies: Evidence of Border-City
Pairs," forthcoming in Journal of Urban
Economics.
- Brownsville Economic Development Council and
McAllen Economic Development Corp.
- In 2000, for example, only 2.6 percent of
Laredo's nonfarm employment—some 1,800 workers—was
working in manufacturing, compared with 15 percent
in El Paso, 12 percent in Brownsville and 8
percent in McAllen.
- See J. Michael Patrick, "Maquiladoras and
South Texas Border Economic Development," Journal
of Borderlands Studies, Spring 1989, pp.
89–98. The author suggests that the situation
has not changed much in the ensuing 12 years.
- A 1988 survey of maquiladora companies in
Ciudad Juárez alone showed suppliers
in every U.S. state except Hawaii, with a large
portion in Midwestern and Northeastern states.
See William L. Mitchell and Lucinda Vargas,
"The Economic Impact of the Maquiladora Industry
in Juárez on El
Paso, Texas, and Other Sections of the United
States,"Grupo Bermúdez
Industrial Developers, Ciudad
Juárez, Chihuahua, 1989, photocopy.
Current anecdotal evidence shows that maquiladoras
continue to have close links with suppliers
throughout the United States.
- In 2000, the weighted average unemployment
rate of Texas' four major border cities was
more than double the national and state unemployment
averages.
- ADC Telecommunications offers an example of
how cities like El Paso are developing industrially
in response to the presence of maquiladoras
across the border. The company manufactures
telecommunications equipment at two plants in
Juárez and one
in Delicias, Chihuahua.
Late last year, ADC opened a metal fabrication
plant in El Paso to feed components to its Mexican
facilities. ADC also has a distribution center
in Santa Teresa, N.M., just west of El Paso.
- If a broader definition of employment is used,
including jobs outside the Social Security system,
El Paso's employment gain between 1993 and 2000
was larger, at 40,635 new jobs. See Borderplex
Economic Outlook: 2000–2002, Border
Region Modeling Project, The University of Texas
at El Paso, November 2000, Business Report SR00-1.
- El Paso is the second-largest land port at
the border for U.S. –Mexico trade, after
Laredo. During 1994– 2000, total U.S.–Mexico
trade through El Paso grew 122 percent to $40.3
billion. The trade increase was due to both
maquiladora-specific and NAFTA-specific activity.
|
 |
|
|