|
Third Quarter 1994
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
| Economic Review
was published until 1999. |
|
An Economy at Risk? The Social Costs
of School Inefficiency
Lori L. Taylor
A preponderance of economic evidence
demonstrates that the public school system in the United States
is less efficient than it could be. However, few researchers
have examined the economic consequences of such inefficiency.
Lori Taylor finds that, although school inefficiency can crowd
out consumption and investment in the remainder of the economy
and can reduce the rate of return to investments in education,
inefficiency has only a limited impact on economic activity.
She estimates that, even compounded over twenty-five years,
plausible degrees of school inefficiency reduce consumption
and potential GDP by less than 1 percent. As such, the social
costs of school inefficiency are similar in magnitude to the
social costs of monopoly or the corporate income tax.
Monetary Policy and Recent Business-Cycle
Experience
R. W. Hafer, Joseph H. Haslag and
Scott E. Hein
Some critics of recent monetary policy
have focused on slow M2 growth, claiming that the Federal
Reserve is too interested in price stability and is forsaking
its growth mandate. Others criticize the Fed for achieving
price stability too cautiously and urge the adoption of a
rule that seeks to eliminate inflation more quickly.
R. W. Hafer, Joseph Haslag and Scott
Hein examine two alternative monetary policies and gauge their
expected impacts on economic activity. Both policies are simulated
over the period 1987–92. One policy, a GNP-targeting
rule similar to one proposed by Bennett McCallum, slows nominal
GNP growth substantially. Simulated nominal GNP, however,
is quite volatile under the GNP-targeting rule. The other
policy, referred to in the article as the M2-targeting approach
would have resulted in somewhat faster average nominal GNP
growth compared with what actually occurred, the start-and-stop
pattern exhibited during the recent U.S. recovery would still
be present. Thus, the evidence indirectly supports the notion
that real shocks were the driving force behind recent weakness
in economic activity.
GATT and the New Protectionism
David M. Gould and William C. Gruben
The Uruguay Round of the General Agreement
on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) is the first agreement of its
kind that reduces or eliminates tariffs on many goods and
addresses issues related to intellectual property rights,
trade in services and agricultural subsidies. With good reason,
it has generated much optimism about the future of free world
trade.
But does GATT's trade liberalization
today mean that trade will remain liberalized tomorrow? Increasingly,
governments are counteracting the perceived unfair trade practices
of other nations with their own trade barriers. While concerns
about fairness are legitimate, raising trade barriers to counteract
actual or perceived unfair trade practices of others is another
form of protectionism that restricts world trade. This new
protectionism has most often taken the form of antidumping
and countervailing duties.
Because the use of antidumping and countervailing
duties has grown dramatically in recent years across many
countries, David Gould and William Gruben analyze whether
the recent changes to the GATT accord will discourage the
most protectionist aspects of these widely used trade barriers.
Gould and Gruben find that while the new GATT agreement does
not eliminate the ability of such countries to misuse antidumping
and countervailing duties, the accord delineates the rules
of such duties much more clearly and provides mechanisms that
will likely limit their abuse.
The Saving Grace
Richard Alm and David M. Gould
Many economists agree that a country's
rate of saving can be a key factor in the growth rate and
living standards the country achieves. Analysts are less certain
about which factors have positive and negative influences
on saving, what role government should have in creating a
better environment for saving, and the extent to which a country
can offset the effects of low domestic saving by tapping into
other countries' savings.
Economists, bankers, and officials discussed
these and other aspects of saving earlier this year at a symposium
sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. Richard Alm
and David Gould recap much of that discussion in this article.
|