|
Fourth Quarter 1997
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
| Economic Review
was published until 1999. |
|
Has Long-Run Profitability
Risen in the 1990s?
John V. Duca
This article analyzes the recent
rebound in nonfinancial corporate profitability, as measured
by after-tax profits as a share of output. Virtually all the
resurgence in corporate profitability during the 1990s reflects
a cyclical increase in profits and a decline in net interest
expense associated with deleveraging and lower interest rates.
In this sense, it is not clear that a long-lasting upward
shift in the economic returns to capital has occurred, after
accounting for short-run cyclical-related movements and for
how deleveraging and lower interest rates have shifted capital
payments away from debtholders toward equityholders.
![Read more about "Has Long-Run Profitability Risen in the 1990s?" [PDF]](../../../images/more.gif)
Intellectual Property
Rights and Product Effectiveness
Stephen P. A. Brown and William
C. Gruben
Recent economic literature concludes
that an invention-importing country, where domestic invention
is scarce or nonexistent, may reduce its welfare and, in some
cases, world welfare, by protecting intellectual property
developed elsewhere. The analysis presented in this article
uses economic theory to show that such a conclusion may not
be fully warranted for a wide range of products, such as antibiotics,
fungicides, herbicides, and pesticides, whose effectiveness
diminishes with cumulative use. Both developed and developing
countries may find that protecting intellectual property rights
for these products will enhance welfare-even when their invention
is provided for free. ![Read more about "Intellectual Property Rights and Product Effectiveness"[PDF].](../../../images/more.gif)
Is the Business Cycle
of Argentina "Different"?
Finn E. Kydland and Carlos E. J.
M. Zarazaga
Despite the relative success of Real
Business Cycle (RBC) models to replicate key moments of the
business cycles of the United States and several European
countries, economic research in Latin America tends to take
the more traditional view that monetary factors play a predominant
role in the economic fluctuations of countries in that part
of the world. The different theoretical approach is often
justified on the grounds that business cycles in Latin America
are "different." However, few comparative studies
have analyzed the relevant differences between the business
cycles of Latin America and those of the United States and
Europe.
In this article, Finn Kydland
and Carlos Zarazaga present business-cycle facts for Argentina,
following as closely as possible the empirical methodology
and statistics other studies have used to characterize U.S.
and European business cycles. Overall, the authors find no
a priori evidence that dynamic general equilibrium models,
in which real shocks are the only source of economic fluctuations,
cannot potentially account for as much of the Argentinean
business cycle as such models do for business cycles in the
United States and Europe. ![Read more about "Is the Business Cycle of Argentina Different?"[PDF].](../../../images/more.gif)
|