|
December 1996
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
Houston Branch
Fort Bend County:
Life in the Urban Fast Lane
Fort Bend County, 14 miles southwest
of the central business district, is the fastest growing part
of the Houston metropolitan area. Fort Bend's spectacular
success in recent years has earned it a long and growing list
of accolades: Woods and Poole, an economic consulting group,
listed it as having the 10th strongest economic base of any
U.S. county; American Demographics Inc. named it the nation's
third-best address for managerial and professional workers;
Texas Business named its Sugar Land community the
sCosoleacaqueecond-best city in Texas for corporate expansion
or relocation.
Census data show that among counties with 250,000 or more
residents, Fort Bend enjoyed the second-fastest population
growth of any U.S. county through the first half of the 1990s,
trailing only Clark County in the Las Vegas, Nevada, area.
What's the formula for this kind of
growth? Fort Bend's companions on these high-performance lists
are mostly suburban counties across the United States, including
cities such as Washington, D.C., Atlanta and Memphis. High-growth
Texas counties include Williamson (Round Rock and Georgetown
near Austin) and the more mature Collin County (Plano and
North Dallas). Fort Bend might be dismissed as just another
emerging suburb, except that its level of success sets it
apart. This article examines the general formula for suburban
growth, as well as Fort Bend's adroit application of these
high-growth principles.
Rising Income Levels
Is the growth of the suburbs simply
a product of growing affluence? The economic studies available
say no. There are two conflicting forces at work in suburbanization
as income rises, and the forces offset one another.
First, as affluence rises, commuters
sacrifice more income per minute of travel time. The opportunity
cost of commuting increases, and the attraction of long trips
to work decreases. Second, higher income makes larger lots
attractive. As income increases, consumers are willing to
travel greater distances as they are pulled toward inexpensive
suburban land.
On average, for suburbs of cities across
the United States, the studies suggest that the two conflicting
effects tend to cancel each other out. For Fort Bend, however,
these factors probably yield local advantages. First, the
key competitor suburbs of Houston—such as the Woodlands,
the FM 1960 area or Kingwood—are to the north and northwest;
the suburbs in eastern Fort Bend County are closer and offer
better commuting times to both the central business district
and the Galleria office and retail complex. Other things equal,
Fort Bend should be the first choice of the affluent commuter.
Second, throughout the Houston suburbs,
we find an unusually large supply of inexpensive land. This
is the result, in part, of geography and history and, in part,
of Houston's unique reliance on more than 500 municipal utility
districts that develop suburban infrastructure on demand.
In Fort Bend's case, land has been available in extraordinarily
large tracts. In the 1980s, as the oil bust sent residential
property values across the city plummeting, Houston's large
master-planned communities became a safe haven for homeowners,
with property values preserved best in large developments
that offered a uniform and high-quality product. These planned
communities also provided significant cost savings to the
developer through economies of scale, and developers in turn
offered highly competitive home prices. Such large-scale developments,
however, depended on the unique availability of large tracts
of land.
It was here that Sugar Land and Fort
Bend County's past as an agricultural area—especially
its plantation history in sugar, rice and other products—came
into play. Fort Bend's legacy was the large tracts required
for residential development.
The first of the 11 planned communities
now located in Fort Bend was the 1,200-acre Sugar Creek development,
begun in the late 1960s on farmland belonging to the Imperial
Sugar Co. The project's success quickly led to Imperial Sugar's
sale of another 7,500 acres of its plantation to Gerald Hines,
who opened the massive First Colony development. Now, more
than 25 years later, First Colony covers 9,700 acres and is
nearing the end of its development life. The most recent of
the county's 11 planned communities, just beginning development,
is the 6,100-acre Sienna Plantation on Highway 6 near Arcola.
In another 20 to 25 years, this community is expected to be
home to 35,000 residents in 14,000 households.
Location and timing have worked for
Fort Bend. Large tracts of land located close to the inner
city give it important advantages over other Houston suburbs.
Suburb Versus Central City
Suburban advantages over the central
city usually assume three dimensions: taxes, schools and crime.
Fort Bend has been able to exploit all three factors.
The Houston metropolitan area does not
suffer the classic central city/suburban fiscal relationship,
characterized by a downward spiral in the inner city touched
off a declining tax base, which forces higher central city
tax rates, which drive business to the suburbs, and so forth.
Although Fort Bend has used its growing tax base to cut its
property taxes in recent years, property taxes generally remain
higher throughout the suburbs than in the city, and Houston's
inner loop has actually experienced moderate population growth
in the 1990s.
Fort Bend's fiscal advantages have been
strategic strikes. For example, Stafford—located on
the rich retail alley along Interstate 59 South—has
eliminated all property taxes to draw retailers and, instead,
finances the city budget through its growing sales tax revenue.
Throughout the county, various communities have dropped the
statewide tax on inventories—the so-called freeport
exemption—and have attracted numerous valve and computer
manufacturers as a result. Finally, aggressive city and county
property tax abatements are negotiated with companies that
bring well- paying jobs or match the upscale image the county
promotes.
Schools and crime are important factors
in drawing population to the suburbs. According to Texas'
test-based rating system for schools, in 1994–95 both
the Houston Independent School District (HISD) and the Fort
Bend ISD had seven schools achieve the top "exemplary"
rating. The total number of schools ranked, however, was 263
HISD schools, compared with 41 in Fort Bend ISD. All the Fort
Bend schools were at least "acceptable" under this
rating system, while over a quarter of the HISD schools were
not. Similar comparisons can be made to school districts located
throughout suburban Fort Bend, Harris and Montgomery counties.
There is no question that the Houston
metropolitan area has made great progress in reducing its
overall crime rate in recent years: crime in Houston is now
lower than in Dallas, San Antonio and even Austin. However,
within the metropolitan area, violent crimes are three times
more common in Harris County than in Fort Bend, and nonviolent
crime is twice as common in Harris County.
The role of race in Houston's suburbanization
is harder to fathom today. In the 1960s, the integration of
many of Houston's inner-city neighborhoods led to white-flight,
and neighborhood demographics shifted quickly into minority
status. Today, the planned communities of suburban Fort Bend
County are racially and ethnically integrated, but income
and class have replaced race as the selection criteria for
entry. These new suburbs still leave the economically disadvantaged
behind as an inner-city problem.
More Than A Suburb?
Fort Bend primarily depends on
the commuter for income. Figure 1 shows the net gain in wages,
salaries and employer-paid benefits to Fort Bend and Montgomery
County as commuters cross county lines. In 1994, 54 percent
of wages and salaries earned by Fort Bend residents came from
outside the county, a figure that slipped from 58.6 percent
in 1990. Fort Bend's rise as a commuter county in the 1970s
is also evident in Figure 1, as is Montgomery County's similar
dependence on commuter traffic for half or more of local wages
and salaries.
The first businesses to follow commuters
to the suburbs are retailers, and the relatively affluent
Fort Bend commuters have not been neglected in this regard.
Development followed a predictable pattern: at first, "one-
stop" retailers such as dry cleaners, building materials
and food stores moved to Fort Bend, with comparison shopping
such as clothing and furniture left to the city. However,
the recent opening of the First Colony Mall and retail centers
such as the Fountains in Stafford have brought higher levels
of retailing to Fort Bend. Taxable retail sales averaged annual
increases of 9 percent from 1989 to 1995. The addition of
First Colony Mall in 1995, however, pushed retail sales up
15.8 percent between 1995 and 1996.
The second phase of suburban business
development comes as employers follow employees back to the
suburbs. With only 20 percent of Houston's office space in
the central business district and most of it spread across
the city's freeways and interchanges, suburbs like Fort Bend
have become significant white-collar employers. Companies
such as Fluor Daniel, Prudential Insurance, Schlumberger,
Unocal and MCI continue to move large numbers of professional
and managerial employees into Fort Bend County.
Combining this white-collar employment
with a growing contingent of clean, light industry in electronics,
valves and oil equipment, Fort Bend is slowly developing a
local economic base apart from its commuters. Its dependence
on the city of Houston and Harris County remains high, however,
not just for commuter income but for the social, cultural
and sporting amenities the suburbs cannot provide.
—Robert W. Gilmer and Timothy
K. Hopper
Houston
Beige Book
November 1996
Economic expansion remains moderate
in Houston, with a notable slowdown in the local construction
in recent months. Early results indicate a good holiday season
ahead for retailers. Oil machinery and durable manufacturing
employment continue to grow in response to higher energy prices.
Retailing
After good fall sales, local retailers
are looking forward to a great holiday season. Some, however,
are concerned about its shortness this year. Heavy seasonal
promotions began well before Thanksgiving, and early results
indicate excellent sales.
Energy Prices and Refining
Weather in recent weeks has been
driving markets for crude oil and related products, especially
heating oil. Heating oil inventories are still 16 percent
under last year's levels, and efforts to rebuild stocks have
cut gasoline production and inventories and pulled gasoline
stocks to the lowest levels in 25 years. Gasoline prices at
the pump have been about 17 cents higher than at this time
last year.
Crude oil and natural gas prices languished
in warm November weather, but a cold December in the Midwest
and along the East Coast revived both. Crude oil rebounded
to $23 to $25 per barrel, and spot prices for natural gas
at the Henry Hub in Louisiana have been over $3. Natural gas
inventories remain 8 percent below 1995 levels and are being
drawn down unusually early.
Refiners were unable to capitalize on
rising oil product prices to build profits, as low inventories
and rising crude prices raised production costs almost as
fast as product prices.
Oil Services and Machinery
Demand for oil services and machinery
remains exceptionally strong, capacity is limited and numerous
shortages of geophysical and oil field skills are being reported.
Over the past 12 months, Houston has added 1,300 jobs in oil
field machinery and 6,200 in durable manufacturing.
Offshore work has peaked worldwide,
with rigs unavailable to expand operations. Domestic onshore
drilling has increased by about 75 rigs over this time last
year.
With 50 or more rigs added in recent
weeks, Texas has been the biggest winner in this onshore expansion.
Texas drilling has extended beyond the Gulf Coast region and
into South Texas, with natural gas as the chief objective.
Petrochemicals
Higher prices for natural gas liquids
and oil are hurting petrochemical producers. Both domestic
and foreign demand remains strong, but not strong enough to
pass through all the recent increase in feedstock costs.
Real Estate
Home sales in Houston showed mixed
results in October. Existing home sales were up 2 percent
over the October 1995 level, while new home sales dropped
14 percent. New home inventories were up 19 percent over a
year ago, and prices of newly built homes were pushed up sharply
by higher lumber and wallboard prices.
One respondent expressed concern about
a softer market for new apartments, with landlords beginning
to grant concessions. The industrial warehouse market remains
strong, and the suburban office market is probably poised
for modest expansion.
| About Houston
Business
For more information or
copies of this publication, contact Bill Gilmer
at (713) 652-1546 or bill.gilmer@dal.frb.org,
or write to Bill Gilmer, Houston Branch, Federal
Reserve Bank of Dallas, P.O. Box 2578, Houston,
Texas 77252. This publication is available on
the Internet at www.dallasfed.org.
The views expressed are
those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect
the positions of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
or the Federal Reserve System. |
|
|