|
December 2005
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
Houston Branch
Concentration of Energy
Production and Processing on the Gulf Coast
One of the results of Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita was a sudden and widespread public
recognition that energy facilities are heavily concentrated
on the Texas and Louisiana Gulf Coast. As these storms
limited the production, processing and movement of U.S.
energy products, the unfolding events in Texas and Louisiana
became a compelling pocketbook issue throughout the
United States. This article reviews the reasons for
the concentration of so much energy activity on the
Texas and Louisiana Gulf Coast and documents the extent
of this concentration in both production and processing
of oil and natural gas.
Why the Gulf of Mexico?
A question asked again and
again by television reporters as the recent hurricanes
crossed the Gulf of Mexico and approached land was how
so much energy infrastructure came to be located on
the Gulf Coast. Table 1 shows that the size of the Gulf
Coast population and economy probably plays a relatively
small role. Texas and Louisiana combined account for
9.2 percent of the nation’s population and 8.3
percent of its personal income. The Gulf Coast portions
of these two states represent less than half the state
totals, and the Houston–Texas City region alone
makes up about half the Gulf Coast population and income.[1]
| Table 1 |
| Texas, Louisiana and the Gulf
Coast as a Share of U.S. Population and Income (Percent) |
| |
Population |
Personal Income |
| Texas |
7.6 |
|
7.0 |
|
| Louisiana |
1.6 |
|
1.3 |
|
| Gulf Coast |
4.0 |
|
3.6 |
|
| South
Louisiana
|
1.1 |
|
1.0 |
|
| Port
Arthur-Lake Charles
|
0.3 |
|
0.3 |
|
| Houston-Texas
City
|
1.9 |
|
2.0 |
|
| South
Texas
|
0.7 |
|
0.4 |
|
|
| NOTE: Totals may not add due
to rounding error. Data are for 2003. |
| SOURCES: Bureau of Economic
Analysis; authors' calculations. |
Much more important than population
is the concentration of oil and natural gas reserves
in the region. Table 2 shows that 22.4 percent of the
nation’s oil reserves and 35.4 percent of its
natural gas reserves are on the Gulf Coast or in adjacent
state and federal waters. For both oil and gas, the
federal offshore is home to by far the most reserves.
In terms of production from these reserves, the Gulf’s
share is significantly higher for both products: 30.6
percent of U.S. oil and 38.7 percent of natural gas.
Once again, the waters of the Gulf of Mexico dominate,
providing 26.4 percent of U.S. oil production and 21.3
percent of natural gas.
| Table 2 |
| Gulf Coast and Offshore Areas
as a Share of U.S. Reserves, Production and Drilling
Activity (Percent) |
| |
Reserves |
Production |
|
| |
Oil |
Natural Gas |
Oil |
Natural
Gas |
Drilling |
| United
States |
100.0 |
|
100.0 |
|
100.0 |
|
100.0 |
|
100.0 |
|
| Gulf Coast |
22.4 |
|
35.4 |
|
30.6 |
|
38.7 |
|
28.8 |
|
|
South Louisiana
|
1.4 |
|
1.8 |
|
2.0 |
|
4.2 |
|
2.3 |
|
|
Houston
+ Port
Arthur
|
0.9 |
|
1.7 |
|
1.5 |
|
3.7 |
|
5.5 |
|
| South
Texas
|
0.4 |
|
5.5 |
|
0.7 |
|
9.5 |
|
8.2 |
|
| Offshore
Texas |
1.1 |
|
3.5 |
|
3.5 |
|
N.A. |
|
0.9 |
|
| Offshore
Louisiana |
18.6 |
|
22.9 |
|
22.9 |
|
N.A. |
|
11.9 |
|
| Total
Offshore |
19.7 |
|
26.4 |
|
26.4 |
|
21.3 |
|
12.8 |
|
|
| NOTE: Drilling data are for
the 12-month period from November 2004 to October
2005. Offshore data are for both federal and state
waters. Houston and Port Arthur are Texas Railroad
Commission District 3; South Texas is District 2
plus District 4. Reserves and production data are
for 2004. |
| SOURCES: Reserves and production
are from the Energy Information Administration or
from Texas and Louisiana state governments; drilling
data are from Baker Hughes; authors' calculations. |
Oil and gas exploration activity
in the region accounted for 28.8 percent of the rigs
active in the U.S. during the 12 months ending in October
2005. Although the Gulf of Mexico has fallen out of
favor in this drilling cycle as a target for exploration,
it was still the most active Gulf Coast region, with
12.8 percent of active rigs.[2] South Texas was the
most active land area, with 8.2 percent of the working
U.S. rigs.
History also plays a role in the
concentration of energy facilities along the Gulf Coast.
The first true gushers in the U.S. were the salt dome
discoveries of the Texas Gulf Coast, beginning with
Spindletop in 1900 and followed quickly by Sour Lake,
Batson, North Dayton, Humble and many others. Several
large refineries on the Gulf Coast, especially in Beaumont,
Port Arthur and Houston, date to these huge discoveries
in the industry’s early days. The ties in skills
and inputs between refineries, gas processors and petrochemical
plants created numerous agglomerative cost economies
as the region developed.
Energy processors are also drawn
to the region by water transportation, an inexpensive
way to move massive amounts of gas and liquid product
by ship or barge. These large volumes may be inputs,
such as crude to be refined, or products, such as gasoline
or fuel oil. The growing U.S. dependence on imported
oil in recent years has simply heightened the importance
of port facilities like the Louisiana Offshore Oil Port
and the Houston Ship Channel.
Finally, for regions of the U.S.
less familiar with gas processing, refining or petrochemical
production, the plants are simply perceived as big,
noisy, dirty and dangerous. They are natural targets
for local not-in-my-backyard movements, often met with
sympathy by regulators. In Texas and Louisiana, long
familiarity has bred a comfort level and acceptance
of the negatives generated by these plants that is not
found elsewhere, as well as a better understanding of
the positive economic impacts that accompany these facilities.
Processing Energy
Energy-processing facilities
on the Gulf Coast fall primarily into three groups:
refineries, gas processors and petrochemical producers.
The refinery is the most familiar of these, taking a
barrel of crude oil and turning it into gasoline, heating
oil, jet fuel, diesel and other oil products. Table
3 shows that about 17.1 million barrels per day of crude
oil are refined in the U.S., 39.8 percent of it on the
Gulf Coast. The share refined by the Texas and Louisiana
Gulf Coast is slightly larger than the share refined
in the East Coast, West Coast and Great Lakes regions
combined.
| Table 3 |
| Refining Capacity on the Gulf
Coast as a Share of U.S. Gas Processing |
|
Barrels (thousands) |
Capacity (percent) |
| United
States |
17,125 |
|
100.0 |
|
| West Coast |
2,643 |
|
15.4 |
|
| East Coast |
1,717 |
|
10.0 |
|
| Great
Lakes |
2,322 |
|
13.6 |
|
| Gulf Coast |
6,818 |
|
39.8 |
|
| South
Louisiana
|
2,123 |
|
12.4 |
|
|
Port Arthur-Lake
Charles |
1,716 |
|
10.0 |
|
| Houston-Texas
City
|
2,293 |
|
13.4 |
|
| South
Texas
|
686 |
|
4.0 |
|
| Other
U.S. |
3,625 |
|
21.2 |
|
|
| NOTE: Data refer to early 2005. |
| SOURCES: Energy Information
Administration; authors' calculations. |
On the Texas and Louisiana coastline,
we see refinery capacity more or less uniformly divided
between South Louisiana, Port Arthur–Lake Charles
and Houston–Texas City. South Texas has only 4
percent of U.S. refining, concentrated in Corpus Christi.
Natural gas used by consumers
is primarily methane. When natural gas is produced from
an oil or gas well, it may contain water vapor, hydrogen
sulfide, carbon dioxide, helium, nitrogen or various
natural gas liquids. The gas stream must be processed
to remove impurities, but also to remove the heavier
hydrocarbon liquids—ethane, butane, propane, isobutanes
and natural gasoline—which have a higher value
than the methane gas stream. The liquids will then be
used for the manufacture of plastics or home heating
fuel or as refinery feedstock.
Table 4 shows the concentration
of natural gas-processing capacity and 2004 throughput
of natural gas streams. The Gulf Coast accounts for
34.5 percent of U.S. capacity and 31.1 percent of throughput,
figures that are slightly lower than the 38.7 percent
share the Gulf Coast holds in natural gas production.
The region accounts for only 22.8 percent of the U.S.
production of liquids because the Gulf Coast gas stream
is less rich in liquids than it is in other parts of
the country.
| Table 4 |
| Natural Gas Processing on the
Gulf Coast as a Share of U.S. Gas Processing (Percent) |
|
Capacity |
Gas
throughput |
Liquid
products |
| United
States |
100.0 |
|
100.0 |
|
100.0 |
|
| Gulf Coast |
34.5 |
|
31.1 |
|
22.8 |
|
| South
Louisiana
|
21.5 |
|
18.1 |
|
11.1 |
|
|
Port Arthur-Lake
Charles
|
5.4 |
|
4.5 |
|
3.4 |
|
| Houston-Texas
City
|
2.7 |
|
2.5 |
|
3.2 |
|
| South
Texas
|
5.0 |
|
6.1 |
|
5.1 |
|
|
| NOTE: Parts may not sum to
total due to rounding error. Data are annual for
2004. |
| SOURCES: Oil and Gas Journal;
authors' calculations. |
South Louisiana is the dominant
Gulf Coast location for these gas-processing facilities,
accepting the gas streams as they come ashore from pipelines
in the Gulf of Mexico. The Houston–Texas City
share of U.S. gas processing is the smallest at only
2.5 percent, despite the fact that the Mont Belvieu
market center, located outside Houston, is the NYMEX
settlement point for gas liquids and a major storage
center.
Petrochemical plants use the natural
gas liquids or oil-based naphtha to produce plastic
or synthetic rubber. Ethane and propane would be the
large bellwether products for the industry, among thousands
of plastic, rubber and polymer products that evolve
as you go further downstream. Table 5 shows that the
Gulf Coast dominates U.S ethylene production, turning
out 90.9 percent of the 28.3 million tons of ethylene
produced each year. The Houston–Texas City region
accounts for about half of the Gulf Coast ethylene production,
while South Louisiana and Port Arthur–Lake Charles
each account for 19 percent of U.S. output.
| Table 5 |
| Gulf Coast Ethylene Capacity
as a Share of U.S. Capacity |
|
Million tons per year |
Percent |
| United
States |
28.32 |
|
100.0 |
|
| Gulf Coast |
25.73 |
|
90.9 |
|
| South
Louisiana
|
5.37 |
|
19.0 |
|
|
Port Arthur-Lake
Charles
|
5.39 |
|
19.0 |
|
| Houston-Texas
City
|
12.52 |
|
44.2 |
|
| South
Texas
|
2.45 |
|
8.7 |
|
| Other |
2.59 |
|
9.1 |
|
|
| NOTE: Data are for 2004. |
| SOURCES: Oil and Gas Journal;
authors' calculations. |
Table 6 is yet another way to
see the concentration of a number of chemical products
on the Gulf Coast. As Hurricanes Katrina and Rita crossed
the Gulf of Mexico, the uncertainty of their paths and
their power caused widespread precautionary shutdowns
of petrochemical facilities. This table shows the percentage
of capacity shut down at the peak period by each storm,
expressed as a percentage of North American capacity.
It is again clear from this table the extent to which
the Texas and Louisiana coasts dominate the U.S. petrochemical
industry.
| Table 6 |
Chemical Plants Affected by Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita
(Percent capacity shut down at peak by each
storm) |
|
Katrina |
Rita |
| Ethylene |
15.8 |
|
58.5 |
|
| Propylene |
18.5 |
|
30.7 |
|
| Benzene |
19.6 |
|
68.5 |
|
| Polyethylene |
3.7 |
|
63.0 |
|
| Styrene |
29.3 |
|
85.3 |
|
| Butadiene |
9.1 |
|
95.8 |
|
|
| NOTE: Data are for 2004, expressed
as a percentage of North American capacity. |
| SOURCE: CMAI Inc. |
| — |
Robert W. Gilmer |
| |
Carrie Ann Fossum |
| |
Iram Siddik |
 |
| About
the Authors
Gilmer is a vice president
at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. Fossum
and Siddik are students at Rice University.
Notes
-
Table 1 divides the Texas and Louisiana
Gulf Coast into four regions based on
county definitions. Each region is anchored
by one or more metropolitan areas. Seven
counties of the Houston–Sugar
Land–Baytown metropolitan area
make up 92.2 percent of the population
of the Houston–Texas City region.
New Orleans is 64.5 percent of South
Louisiana. Beaumont–Port Arthur
and Lake Charles are 62.9 percent of
the Port Arthur–Lake Charles region.
Corpus Christi, Brownsville–Harlingen
and McAllen–Edinburg are 68.8
percent of South Texas. Tables 3 through
5 are also based on these definitions.
Table 2, as explained in the note, is
based on state energy regulator definitions
of Railroad Commission Districts (for
Texas), South Louisiana and offshore
state waters.
-
The average number of working rigs
in the Gulf of Mexico was 136 in 2000
and 148 in 2001. Drilling in the Gulf
never bounced back from a cyclical low
of 109 in 2002; the rig count averaged
only 93 in 2004 and 88 year-to-date
in 2005.
|
 |
|
Houston Beige
Book
November 2005
Houston’s economy continues
to grow and perform well. Seasonally adjusted job growth
has been at a 2.1 percent annual rate over the past
three months, and the unemployment rate (inflated by
hurricane evacuees) ticked down from 5.9 percent to
5.8 percent in October. Houston’s Purchasing Managers
Index continues to indicate rapid underlying growth
in the local economy, with readings staying near 60—well
above the 50 value that indicates no growth. Elevated
energy prices and growing exploration activity continue
to provide the basis for much of the current local expansion.
Retail and Auto Sales
October saw retailers generally
meet their plan for the month, and soft sales in early
November quickly picked up with the onset of cooler
weather. Both department and discount stores were reporting
good results as Thanksgiving approached. Talk of high
gasoline prices as a barrier to retail sales dropped
off as prices fell, but it has been replaced by concern
about winter utility bills as another potential shock
to consumer budgets.
Sales of cars and trucks in Houston
followed the national trend downward in October, falling
1.2 percent compared with the year earlier. On a year-to-date
basis, sales are up nearly 6 percent.
Single-Family Housing
Houston’s existing
home sales surged 12 percent in October, partly because
of September closings that were delayed until October
by hurricanes. The median price of an existing home
has risen 7.2 percent over the past 12 months.
Houston homebuilders had their
best third quarter ever, with starts up 14 percent over
the same period last year. New home sales equaled 96
percent of these third-quarter starts, keeping supply
and demand in line. First-time homebuyers have been
the primary driver in this market in recent quarters,
perhaps hoping to beat interest rate increases.
Energy Prices
Crude prices in early October
were near $63 per barrel. They weakened steadily to
near $58 through the month. Rising crude inventories
(about 10 percent above normal by mid-November) are
due to weak domestic demand. The demand for distillates
(diesel and heating oil) bounced back to above-normal
levels in October, as did gasoline demand. The wholesale
price of these products tended to follow crude down,
although strong demand for diesel and the approach of
the winter heating season kept distillates from falling
as much as gasoline. Both gasoline and distillate inventories
were near normal.
Refining and Chemicals
By mid-November, refining
capacity utilization on the Gulf Coast had returned
to 70 percent, from 40 percent in early October. Refining
margins were about $25 per barrel for the month—an
average of $50 early in the month and $10 at the end.
Imports of refined products were up 70 percent from
year-earlier levels.
Petrochemical producers have raised
prices for a long list of basic products: polyethylene,
acrylic, polypropylene, polystyrene and PVC. Spot prices
for caustic soda have doubled in recent weeks. Ethylene
prices have risen sharply as supply problems on the
Gulf Coast were compounded by plant and pipeline outages
in Canada. Transportation problems continue to plague
the Gulf Coast, with complaints about truck and rail
service, as well as a growing shortage of truck drivers.
Oil Services and Machinery
One contact described the
oil service industry as running machinery and equipment
at 100 percent capacity and asking 120 percent from
its employees. Although exploration activity has slowed
in the Gulf of Mexico, activity has shifted elsewhere.
The domestic rig count has been flat in recent weeks.
The most important shortages at present are cement and
sand. About 200 new rigs are under construction, with
50 of those headed for use offshore. The big question
is whether crews will be available as the rigs come
on line. The industry is increasingly looking abroad
for skills and labor.
| About
Houston Business
For more information
or copies of this publication, contact Bill
Gilmer at (713) 483-3546 or bill.gilmer@dal.frb.org,
or write to Bill Gilmer, Houston Branch,
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, P.O. Box
2578, Houston, TX 77252. This publication
is available on the Internet at www.dallasfed.org.
The views expressed
are those of the authors and do not necessarily
reflect the positions of the Federal Reserve
Bank of Dallas or the Federal Reserve System. |
|
|