|
January 2002
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
The Unsinkable Texas Economy Takes on Water
As you all know, the U.S. economy officially
entered a recession in March 2001. Even as the U.S. economy
began to slow down and then slip downward, the Texas economy
continued to expand. The ability of the Texas economy to remain
buoyant as the national economy slipped into a recession led
many people to call the Texas economy "unsinkable."
More recently, however, the Texas economy
has begun to take on water. The questions we want to address
today are What accounts for the Texas economy’s buoyancy?
How much water have we taken on? To what extent did the terrorist
attacks of 9/11 affect the Texas economy? And what are the
prospects for smooth sailing in the near future?
Texas Usually Outperforms the Nation
Over the past decade, Texas employment
has expanded at a faster rate than the nation’s (Figure 1).
U.S. employment has grown about 2 percent annually. In contrast,
Texas employment has grown about 3 percent annually. In fact,
the Eleventh District economy outperformed all other Federal
Reserve Districts during the most recent expansion (Figure
2).
As shown in Figure 3, the Eleventh District
economic performance was consistent throughout the expansion.
The Eleventh District began the expansion with a relatively
fast start in comparison to other Federal Reserve Districts.
From the mid 1990s onward, however, the Eleventh District
really began to extend its lead. As we can also see, the Eleventh
District economy has slowed less than those of most other
Federal Reserve Districts.
A number of factors contribute to the
faster growth and buoyancy of the Texas economy over the past
decade. For one, Texas has a superior mix of industries. It
has larger concentrations of the faster growing industries.
The mix of industries explains 40 percent of the differential
in the growth rates between Texas and the United States. The
Texas energy industry has also helped by acting to diversify
the portfolio of industries in the state.
Texas has a faster population growth.
About half is due to high birth rates and low mortality rates.
Half is due to in-migration. In-migration is the result of
economic opportunities and a general shift of the U.S. population
to the South and West.
Texas has a low cost of living and doing
business. Texas also has a relatively attractive state and
local government policy. Texas is a small government state,
and the mix of taxes and spending generally supports economic
growth.
The Current Recession
Like the nation’s economy, the
Texas economy has been slowing since early 2000 (Figure 4).
Nonetheless, the Texas edge is evident in the current recession.
U.S. employment began falling in April last year. Texas employment
fell in April, but it did not begin falling on a sustained
basis until October.
A number of factors have contributed
to a weakening of the Texas economy. Slowing U.S. and world
economies weakened markets for goods produced in Texas.
The recession started in high-tech industries. The high-tech
recession was brought about by overestimated profits and distortions
in investment spending that resulted from Y2K. With large
concentrations of high-tech firms in Dallas and Austin, this
downturn hit us hard.
The recession spread to manufacturing
and was particularly evident in economic activity along the
Texas–Mexico border. Weakening world economic activity
has reduced world energy demand and put downward pressure
on energy prices, negatively affecting the region’s energy
industry. In mid-2001, even construction—a consistently fast-growing
industry in the region—began showing signs of slowing.
In looking at how the slowdown began
in Texas, it is instructive to look at the distribution of
high-tech jobs (Figure 5). The Dallas-Fort Worth and Austin
areas account for more than three-fourths of Texas’ high-tech
employment. With a smaller employment base, Austin has the
highest concentration of high-tech jobs in the state. It is
not surprising that Austin is where reports of weakening economic
activity first surfaced in Texas.
As a result of the declines in high
tech, of the major metropolitan areas in Texas, Dallas and
Austin have seen the sharpest increases in unemployment rates
(Figure 6). Despite these recent gains, the unemployment rates
remain below those of the past decade. In recent years, the
Austin unemployment rate had fallen to unbelievably low levels.
In late 2000, Texas exports began to
fall as the world economy weakened (Figure 7). Falling exports
to Mexico made a prominent contribution. Mexico accounts for
nearly half of Texas exports, and exports to Mexico began
falling in mid-2000. Exports to most other country groupings
began falling later in 2000.
Prior to the weakening, the border had
been a source of strength in the Texas economy. Since 1998,
we have had what could be characterized as a "border
boom," with border job growth outstripping growth in
the rest of the state (Figure 8). Among the most encouraging
trends during this growth spurt were gains in border per capita
income—income that had been stagnant for decades.
With weakness in manufacturing spreading
to production plants in Mexico, however, maquiladora employment
began to drop late in 2000 (Figure 9). The rate of decline
accelerated in 2001 and by year end, maquiladora employment
had shrunk by over 200,000 jobs.
The boom had brought about record declines
in the border unemployment rates, but the weakening maquiladoras
and a troubled Mexican economy caused unemployment in Texas
border cities to begin rising again in 2001 (Figure 10).
Border crossings between Mexico and
the U.S. are another measure of economic trade and well-being
along the border. With the slowdown in the economy, border
crossings began falling in the spring of 2001 (Figure 11).
Border crossings suffered another hit with the events of 9/11.
In the days following, border bridges
were subjected to repeated bomb threats and many had to be
closed for hours on end. Since then, increased security measures
implemented after the terrorist attacks have led to lengthy
delays and kept thousands of Mexican shoppers away from border
retailers. Border crossings fell sharply in September and
have remained well below last year’s levels. Retail sales
in El Paso have fared a little better because Mexican shoppers,
while making fewer trips, are purchasing more on each trip.
The Effects of the 9/11 Terrorist
Attacks
As in the nation, the terrorist
attacks of September 11 have pushed Texas toward recession.
As Evan Koenig said in November, the attacks further weakened
the U.S. economy. Weakening U.S. economic activity further
hurt markets for Texas-produced goods, and delayed a potential
high-tech rebound. Weakening economic activity also contributed
to further declines in energy prices. In addition, the airline
industry was one of the most greatly affected industries,
and Texas is more exposed to the airline industry than the
nation as a whole.
Texas employment growth slowed in September
(Figure 12) (a month for which the data would not reflect
the events of September 11). Texas employment fell in both
October and November. This is the first two-month consecutive
drop in Texas employment since 1991. Our intelligence gathering
suggests to us that December data are also likely to show
falling employment for that month.
A Texas Recession?
Looking at a broader measure of
Texas economic activity, the Texas coincident index, we see
that Texas economic activity has been slowing since early
2000 and declining since July (Figure 13). (The coincident
index combines employment, unemployment and gross state product.)
Economists distinguish between recessions (in which economic
activity declines) and growth recessions (in which economic
activity stagnates). Typically, an economy appears to be in
a growth recession before it is evident that it is in recession.
If we compare the current status of
the Texas economy with past Texas recessions and past Texas
growth recessions, we can see that Texas has at least entered
a growth recession. It is quite likely that the Texas economy
is in recession, but we do not yet have sufficient data to
show that Texas has moved past a growth recession.
Declines in our index of Texas leading
economic indicators, as shown in Figure 14, suggest that Texas
economic activity will continue to decline through at least
the current quarter. The leading index also suggests a high
likelihood of recession. The index has declined about as much
as it has in the previous two recessions, though less in percentage
terms.
The leading index is made up of the
nine components shown in Figure 15. These frequently reported
series help predict later movements in broad measures of Texas
economic activity. As is shown in the figure, all but one
of the components declined in 2001.
Texas Fiscal Condition Deteriorating
The economic slowdown affects the
state government’s fiscal picture. The state government is
currently growing faster than the ability to pay. During the
first eight months of 2001, state government expenditures
grew by more than personal income. State government revenues
did grow by more than spending, but only because strong energy
prices boosted severance tax revenues.
With the economic slowdown and much
lower energy prices than late 2000, the growth in state government
revenue has slowed sharply since August. State sales tax revenue
rose by only 0.2 percent from December 2000 to December 2001.
Severance tax revenues were likely much lower for the last
four months of 2001 than they were those same months a year
earlier.
In the meantime, the pressure to increase
expenditure is unlikely to ease. Spending on health and human
services is growing rapidly. Capital expenditures have already
been cut sharply.
The Texas Outlook
Given the current set of economic
circumstances, we generally expect the Texas economy to move
with the U.S. economy. If energy prices remain in their current
range, the Texas economy should begin to resurface as the
U.S. economy moves toward recovery. Given the greater buoyancy
that the Texas economy has than the U.S. economy, the number
of months with declining employment should be fewer. In general,
we expect the current Texas recession to be milder than the
most recent two.
This outlook has some risks. A sharp
and sustained increase in energy prices would improve the
outlook for the Texas economy while it hurt the nation’s.
Conversely, a sharp and sustained decline in energy prices
would worsen the outlook for the Texas economy while it improved
the nation’s. Further terrorist activity in the United States
could deepen and prolong the U.S. recession with negative
effects on Texas economic activity.
Looking farther ahead, we expect the
Texas economy to continue to outperform the nation’s during
the first decade of the 21st century. The factors that contributed
to a strong economic performance over the past decade remain
in place.
—Stephen P. A. Brown, Pia M. Orrenius
and Fiona Sigalla
| About In Depth
This article is based on
a presentation by Stephen P. A. Brown, assistant
vice president, Pia M. Orrenius, senior economist
and Fiona D. Sigalla, economist, Research Department,
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
The views expressed are
those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect
the positions of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
or the Federal Reserve System. |
|
|