Skip to main content
Surveys

Special Questions

Texas Business Outlook Surveys
November 24, 2025

Special Questions

For this month’s survey, Texas business executives were asked supplemental questions on margins, demand, employment and productivity. Results below include responses from participants of all three surveys: Texas Manufacturing Outlook Survey, Texas Service Sector Outlook Survey and Texas Retail Outlook Survey.

Texas Business Outlook Surveys

Data were collected November 10-18 and 310 Texas business executives responded to the surveys.

1. How has your firm’s operating margin, defined as earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) as a share of total revenue, changed over the past six months?

Reports of margin declines are more widespread than a year ago, and the share of Texas businesses citing decreases in margins exceeds the share citing increases. Reports of declining margins over the past six months were most common among retailers (53 percent).

Chart 1
2. How do you expect your firm’s operating margin, defined as earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) as a share of total revenue, to change over the next six months?

Looking ahead, more Texas businesses expect increases in margins over the next six months than expect decreases. However, the balance of expectations is tilted more to the downside than what was reported a year ago. Margin expectations are weakest among retailers, where 21 percent expect increases versus 43 percent expecting decreases.

Chart 2
3. How do you expect demand for your firm’s goods and/or services over the next six months to compare with the past six months, aside from seasonal variation?

Demand expectations among Texas businesses remain bullish. Of responding firms, 44 percent expect increases in demand over the next six months, exceeding the 21 percent share expecting decreases. The balance of responses is unchanged from August but less optimistic than in February.

Chart 3
4. What is your assessment of your firm’s current employment situation in light of your six-month outlook?

About 40 percent of Texas businesses say they are currently understaffed, with 27 percent intending to hire—either for replacement or for new positions. Overall, this represents the smallest hiring share since this question was first posed in October 2022. On the flip side, about 20 percent of responding firms say they are overstaffed, representing the largest share seen thus far. Among overstaffed firms, most are opting not to lay off workers at this time.

Chart 4
5. Compared with a year ago, how has the productivity of your workers (output per hour worked) changed, on average?

Worker productivity has increased for nearly a third of responding Texas businesses and declined for just under 20 percent. About half of respondents note no change in worker productivity over the past year.

Chart 5
5a. How does the increase in productivity experienced over the past year compare with usual?

Among firms reporting increased worker productivity compared with a year ago, most say the pace of productivity increases is about the same as usual. Still, a sizable share—38 percent—say productivity is increasing faster than usual.

  Nov. '25
(percent)
Productivity is increasing faster than usual 37.6
Productivity is increasing at about the same pace as usual 51.6
Productivity is increasing slower than usual 5.4
Productivity had not been increasing but now is 5.4

NOTES: 93 responses. This question was only posed to those noting increased productivity. These calculations exclude the 3.1 percent of respondents selecting “Don’t know.”

The following was posed to those indicating increased productivity in question 5.

5b. Please explain.

Commentary from respondents regarding productivity increases largely points to technology as the driving force, namely the use of AI tools, particularly in the service sector, and also new equipment and machinery, particularly in manufacturing. Several business executives cited benefits from increased training. Some also pointed to productivity improvements from having fewer workers or increased workload, leading to higher output per hour worked across the business.

Responses can be found on the individual survey Special Questions results pages, accessible by the tabs above.

Survey respondents were given the opportunity to also provide comments, which can be found in the Comments tab above.

Texas Business Outlook Surveys

Data were collected November 10-18 and 67 Texas manufacturers responded to the survey.

1. How has your firm’s operating margin, defined as earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) as a share of total revenue, changed over the past six months?
  Dec. '18
(percent)
May '19
(percent)
Dec. '21
(percent)
Nov. '22
(percent)
Nov. '23
(percent
Nov. '24
(percent
Nov. '25
(percent
Increased substantially 11.1 11.4 4.6 5.3 2.3 4.8 1.5
Increased slightly 24.2 23.8 26.4 14.7 32.2 21.4 19.4
Remained the same 17.2 22.9 19.5 20.0 18.4 28.6 28.4
Decreased slightly 35.4 33.3 25.3 38.9 27.6 32.1 34.3
Decreased substantially 12.1 8.6 24.1 21.1 19.5 13.1 16.4

NOTE: 67 responses.

2. How do you expect your firm’s operating margin, defined as earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) as a share of total revenue, to change over the next six months?

Nov. '22
(percent)
Feb. '23
(percent)
Nov. '23
(percent)
Nov. '24
(percent)
Nov. '25
(percent)
Increase substantially 5.3 3.0 4.6 16.7 6.0
Increase slightly 32.6 37.0 24.1 35.7 35.8
Remain the same 20.0 21.0 28.7 35.7 31.3
Decrease slightly 28.4 31.0 28.7 10.7 19.4
Decrease substantially 13.7 8.0 13.8 1.2 7.5

NOTE: 67 responses.

3. How do you expect demand for your firm’s goods and/or services over the next six months to compare with the past six months, aside from seasonal variation?
  Nov. '23
(percent)
Feb. '24
(percent)
Aug. '24
(percent)
Nov. '24
(percent)
Feb. '25
(percent)
Aug. '25
(percent)
Nov. '25
(percent)
Increase substantially 5.7 5.5 1.3 14.3 19.8 12.3 7.5
Increase slightly 33.0 46.2 53.8 58.3 43.0 37.0 41.8
Remain the same 29.5 23.1 20.0 17.9 15.1 29.6 32.8
Decrease slightly 20.5 17.6 22.5 8.3 18.6 16.0 13.4
Decrease substantially 11.4 7.7 2.5 1.2 3.5 4.9 4.5

NOTE: 67 responses.

4. What is your assessment of your firm’s current employment situation in light of your six-month outlook?
Oct. '22
(percent)
Jan. '23
(percent)
Jun. '23
(percent)
Dec. '23
(percent)
Aug. '24
(percent)
Dec. '24
(percent)
Nov. '25
(percent)
We are understaffed and looking to hire for new positions  29.8 29.0 23.2 18.9 17.3 20.0 23.9
We are understaffed and looking to hire for replacement only 21.3 19.0 23.2 16.7 19.8 11.3 6.0
We are understaffed but opting not to hire at this time 13.8 17.0 8.5 16.7 16.0 21.3 14.9
We are at our ideal staffing level   14.9 17.0 26.8 27.8 27.2 30.0 23.9
We are overstaffed but opting not to lay off workers at this time  8.5 9.0 13.4 18.9 13.6 13.8 23.9
We are overstaffed and laying off workers  4.3 3.0 2.4 1.1 2.5 1.3 3.0
Other 7.4 6.0 2.4 0.0 3.7 2.5 4.5

NOTE: 67 responses.

5. Compared with a year ago, how has the productivity of your workers (output per hour worked) changed, on average?
  Nov. '25
(percent)
Increased substantially 1.5
Increased slightly 30.8
Remained the same 46.2
Decreased slightly 12.3
Decreased substantially 9.2

NOTES: 65 responses. These calculations exclude the 1.5 percent of respondents selecting “Don’t know.”

5a. How does the increase in productivity experienced over the past year compare with usual?
  Nov. '25
(percent)
Productivity is increasing faster than usual 38.1
Productivity is increasing at about the same pace as usual 57.1
Productivity is increasing slower than usual 0.0
Productivity had not been increasing but now is 4.8

NOTES: 21 responses. This question was only posed to those noting increased productivity.

The following was posed to those indicating increased productivity in question 5.

5b. Please explain.
Food manufacturing
  • We have put equipment in place to make things more efficient.
Nonmetallic mineral product manufacturing
  • Capital investments in new equipment have made our workforce more productive.
  • Productivity is increasing due to new machinery and processes installed and implemented. We are focusing on lower-priced products to service the lower end of the new home construction business. Volume/sales are increasing, as is productivity and profit. But we are gaining market share; the market is not increasing.
Machinery manufacturing
  • We send employees to class to gain skills.
  • Increased orders have added to the need to increase production. We are now working on plans to purchase new equipment to increase production capacity with the same number of employees.
  • Our workers are highly trained for their jobs and have become more efficient.
Computer and electronic product manufacturing
  • Continuous improvement initiatives are often offset with required savings in our contracts with customers. The expectation is 3 to 5 percent year-over-year cost reductions, so we try to meet or exceed such.
  • The use of AI is improving certain areas of the business as far as efficiency.
  • We have implemented RPA (robotic process automation) in many areas of the supply chain, and people are utilizing other AI tools to become more efficient. We expect efficiencies to increase as we invest more in our AI and process automation technology.
  • We have implemented flexible work hours with our employees when there is less work to do, which allows us to retain our employees and lower our labor costs, and our employees also like this because it allows them time off to do personal things that they want to do.
Transportation equipment manufacturing
  • Having a large, visual, work in process has motivated our production folks to push for more production via new ideas for programs and tooling.
Miscellaneous manufacturing
  • We hired more experienced programmers, which has led to improved output.

Survey respondents were given the opportunity to also provide comments, which can be found in the Comments tab above.

Texas Business Outlook Surveys

Data were collected November 10-18 and 243 Texas business executives responded to the survey.

1. How has your firm’s operating margin, defined as earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) as a share of total revenue, changed over the past six months?
  Dec. '18
(percent)
May '19
(percent)
Dec. '21
(percent)
Nov. '22
(percent)
Nov. '23
(percent
Nov. '24
(percent
Nov. '25
(percent
Increased substantially 5.3 4.0 11.9 3.0 1.8 3.2 2.1
Increased slightly 22.6 22.5 34.3 24.0 19.9 24.2 18.6
Remained the same 27.9 31.7 17.8 27.0 29.4 39.3 33.9
Decreased slightly 33.7 33.7 25.8 33.0 34.6 25.0 33.1
Decreased substantially 10.6 8.0 10.2 13.0 14.3 8.3 12.3

NOTE: 236 responses.

2. How do you expect your firm’s operating margin, defined as earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) as a share of total revenue, to change over the next six months?

Nov. '22
(percent)
Feb. '23
(percent)
Nov. '23
(percent)
Nov. '24
(percent)
Nov. '25
(percent)
Increase substantially 4.0 5.7 4.4 5.2 4.2
Increase slightly 29.2 30.0 25.4 39.8 30.9
Remain the same 27.2 27.0 32.0 34.7 35.2
Decrease slightly 30.6 31.3 30.9 16.7 25.4
Decrease substantially 9.0 6.0 7.4 3.6 4.2

NOTE: 236 responses.

3. How do you expect demand for your firm’s goods and/or services over the next six months to compare with the past six months, aside from seasonal variation?
  Nov. '23
(percent)
Feb. '24
(percent)
Aug. '24
(percent)
Nov. '24
(percent)
Feb. '25
(percent)
Aug. '25
(percent)
Nov. '25
(percent)
Increase substantially 3.6 4.5 3.5 7.9 7.2 4.5 3.4
Increase slightly 34.3 47.4 41.2 47.4 50.0 37.2 39.1
Remain the same 34.7 29.3 33.3 32.0 29.2 37.2 35.7
Decrease slightly 23.0 16.9 19.2 9.9 11.0 16.6 17.4
Decrease substantially 4.4 1.9 2.7 2.8 2.5 4.5 4.3

NOTE: 235 responses.

4. What is your assessment of your firm’s current employment situation in light of your six-month outlook?
Oct. '22
(percent)
Jan. '23
(percent)
Jun. '23
(percent)
Dec. '23
(percent)
Aug. '24
(percent)
Dec. '24
(percent)
Nov. '25
(percent)
We are understaffed and looking to hire for new positions  31.1 27.5 25.8 22.3 16.9 18.8 11.5
We are understaffed and looking to hire for replacement only 19.3 18.5 17.8 16.9 13.3 16.0 14.5
We are understaffed but opting not to hire at this time 11.8 13.1 12.7 11.9 13.3 12.4 13.2
We are at our ideal staffing level   23.0 24.9 29.1 30.4 39.2 40.0 41.0
We are overstaffed but opting not to lay off workers at this time  3.7 6.1 9.8 13.1 12.2 8.4 12.0
We are overstaffed and laying off workers  3.4 4.2 2.9 3.1 2.7 2.0 4.3
Other 7.8 5.8 1.8 2.3 2.4 2.4 3.4

NOTE: 234 responses.

5. Compared with a year ago, how has the productivity of your workers (output per hour worked) changed, on average?
  Nov. '25
(percent)
Increased substantially 3.4
Increased slightly 28.8
Remained the same 49.8
Decreased slightly 15.9
Decreased substantially 2.1

NOTES: 233 responses. These calculations exclude the 1.3 percent of respondents selecting “Don’t know.”

5a. How does the increase in productivity experienced over the past year compare with usual?
  Nov. '25
(percent)
Productivity is increasing faster than usual 37.5
Productivity is increasing at about the same pace as usual 50.0
Productivity is increasing slower than usual 6.9
Productivity had not been increasing but now is 5.6

NOTES: 72 responses. This question was only posed to those noting increased productivity. These calculations exclude the 4.0 percent of respondents selecting “Don’t know.”

The following was posed to those indicating increased productivity in question 5.

5b. Please explain.
Credit intermediation and related activities
  • Productivity improved as efficiencies improved. Training of new staff members and seasonal staff has also led to improved productivity.
  • Our young sales people are growing into their sales roles nicely, neither more quickly than we thought nor more slowly than we feared.
Securities, commodity contracts and other financial investments and related activities
  • AI tools helped increase productivity slightly in the last six months.
Real estate
  • We have put a lot of emphasis on productivity to try to improve it. We have also spent a lot of money on training and education to help our workers improve their productivity.
Rental and leasing services
  • AI.
Professional, scientific and technical services
  • AI is increasing productivity.
  • LLMs [large language models] are helping us do things better or faster, sometimes. This  includes coding.
  • In-house training is beginning to pay off, coupled with increased workload. 
  • We let some low-performing employees go. We now have a much better staff.
  • The gloomy economic outlook is making staff work more seriously and better. AI tool use is allowing staff to do things in a much shorter time and better.
  • Our productivity increases are due to improved skills and technology advancements.
Management of companies and enterprises
  • We are utilizing AI tools where we weren't before.
Administrative and support services
  • We are using AI for some basic tasks.
Educational services
  • Due to staff shortages, we are trying work-arounds and procedure changes to increase productivity with some positive impact.
Social assistance
  • We have made improvements to our processes that have driven significant productivity improvements.
Performing arts, spectator sports and related industries
  • Our team is getting more cohesive.
Food services and drinking places
  • As revenues have dropped and costs have increased, we are not replacing workers who leave, so during peak hours less staff has to work more.

Survey respondents were given the opportunity to also provide comments, which can be found in the Comments tab above.

Texas Business Outlook Surveys

Data were collected November 10-18 and 47 Texas retailers responded to the survey.

1. How has your firm’s operating margin, defined as earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) as a share of total revenue, changed over the past six months?
  Dec. '18
(percent)
May '19
(percent)
Dec. '21
(percent)
Nov. '22
(percent)
Nov. '23
(percent
Nov. '24
(percent
Nov. '25
(percent
Increased substantially 2.6 2.3 16.2 3.1 0.0 0.0 2.2
Increased slightly 10.3 15.9 32.4 13.8 19.3 25.0 11.1
Remained the same 23.1 27.3 21.6 21.5 17.5 35.4 33.3
Decreased slightly 41.0 43.2 21.6 47.7 49.1 31.3 37.8
Decreased substantially 23.1 11.4 8.1 13.8 14.0 8.3 15.6

NOTE: 45 responses.

2. How do you expect your firm’s operating margin, defined as earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) as a share of total revenue, to change over the next six months?

Nov. '22
(percent)
Feb. '23
(percent)
Nov. '23
(percent)
Nov. '24
(percent)
Nov. '25
(percent)
Increase substantially 0.0 4.4 0.0 2.1 2.3
Increase slightly 10.8 16.2 15.8 31.3 18.2
Remain the same 33.8 29.4 38.6 35.4 36.4
Decrease slightly 43.1 38.2 35.1 27.1 34.1
Decrease substantially 12.3 11.8 10.5 4.2 9.1

NOTE: 44 responses.

3. How do you expect demand for your firm’s goods and/or services over the next six months to compare with the past six months, aside from seasonal variation?
  Nov. '23
(percent)
Feb. '24
(percent)
Aug. '24
(percent)
Nov. '24
(percent)
Feb. '25
(percent)
Aug. '25
(percent)
Nov. '25
(percent)
Increase substantially 3.5 1.8 2.1 6.1 2.4 4.8 2.3
Increase slightly 31.6 36.4 29.2 40.8 54.8 33.3 22.7
Remain the same 33.3 30.9 39.6 30.6 26.2 38.1 54.5
Decrease slightly 28.1 30.9 25.0 18.4 16.7 19.0 18.2
Decrease substantially 3.5 0.0 4.2 4.1 0.0 4.8 2.3

NOTE: 44 responses.

4. What is your assessment of your firm’s current employment situation in light of your six-month outlook?
Oct. '22
(percent)
Jan. '23
(percent)
Jun. '23
(percent)
Dec. '23
(percent)
Aug. '24
(percent)
Dec. '24
(percent)
Nov. '25
(percent)
We are understaffed and looking to hire for new positions  31.8 24.3 26.7 20.0 6.3 19.1 4.5
We are understaffed and looking to hire for replacement only 19.7 24.3 18.3 20.0 18.8 12.8 15.9
We are understaffed but opting not to hire at this time 9.1 11.4 8.3 10.9 12.5 14.9 13.6
We are at our ideal staffing level   22.7 31.4 33.3 30.9 31.3 36.2 43.2
We are overstaffed but opting not to lay off workers at this time  7.6 8.6 13.3 12.7 18.8 12.8 13.6
We are overstaffed and laying off workers  3.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 8.3 0.0 2.3
Other 6.1 0.0 0.0 3.6 4.2 4.3 6.8

NOTE: 44 responses.

5. Compared with a year ago, how has the productivity of your workers (output per hour worked) changed, on average?
  Nov. '25
(percent)
Increased substantially 0.0
Increased slightly 36.4
Remained the same 47.7
Decreased slightly 15.9
Decreased substantially 0.0

NOTES: 44 responses.

5a. How does the increase in productivity experienced over the past year compare with usual?
  Nov. '25
(percent)
Productivity is increasing faster than usual 20.0
Productivity is increasing at about the same pace as usual 73.3
Productivity is increasing slower than usual 0.0
Productivity had not been increasing but now is 6.7

NOTES: 15 responses. This question was only posed to those noting increased productivity. These calculations exclude the 6.3 percent of respondents selecting “Don’t know.”

The following was posed to those indicating increased productivity in question 5.

5b. Please explain.
Merchant wholesalers, durable goods
  • We are deploying technology tools to improve our worker productivity.
Motor vehicle and parts dealers
  • Increase of service business has improved our productivity.
Furniture and home furnishings stores
  • Utilization of our new ERP [enterprise resource planning] system, ChatGPT and AI have enabled our teams to focus on more opportunities. We also improved organization, cleanliness and focus on safety.
Electronics and appliance stores
  • Fewer employees are working here. The remaining employees have to do more work in the same amount of time.
Miscellaneous store retailers
  • More emphasis on training and AI tools.
Nonstore setailers
  • We have been installing new equipment to enhance worker productivity, and we have been reaping the benefit from that.

Survey respondents were given the opportunity to also provide comments, which can be found in the Comments tab above.

Special Questions Comments

Survey participants are given the opportunity to submit comments. Some comments have been edited for grammar and clarity.

Texas Manufacturing Outlook Survey
Chemical manufacturing
  • The business of chemicals is arguably in its worst decline since 2008-09.
Computer and electronic product manufacturing
  • Our business activity has increased. We are seeing more activity with urgency from our defense customers, but we are not yet sure how we will manage this if all of the programs become firm orders.
Machinery manufacturing
  • Our labor pool is readily accessible. If we were to need to expand, we can find help as necessary.
Paper manufacturing
  • The decline in business activity correlates with the government shutdown.
Primary metal manufacturing
  • We will reduce hours and do our best to not lay off employees, especially with the holidays approaching. We have a small portion of our workforce that starts out as temporary labor through an outside agency. Those jobs will be cut first.
  • Increased employment is driven by the addition of a new product line.
Texas Service Sector Outlook Survey
Administrative and support services
  • Current employees are being evaluated for productivity, and decisions will be made on retaining them or replacing them with individuals who will be tasked with increased productivity. Current productivity is not cutting it in this market. Compensation plans for 2026 are going to include a reduction in commission rates and incentives only for high-producing individuals. We cannot have another year like 2025.
Ambulatory health care services
  • Our aesthetic business has been significantly impacted, as reflected in the extremely low consumer confidence numbers for the next six months. I personally feel these numbers are driven by inflation fear-mongering by the media combined with the extreme volatility of tariffs and their impact, as well as unknowns as to their continuation due to lawsuits going to the Supreme Court.
  • [We are seeing] higher costs, lower demand and a tough labor market.
Credit intermediation and related activities
  • There is a lag on the impact of interest rate changes to the bottom line, cost of funds vs. pricing on products. The velocity of change is not the same on deposits versus loans.
  • Most businesses are slightly overstaffed so that the enterprise is prepared for an increase in business.
Food services and drinking places
  • I tell my staff that our community appears to be undergoing a quiet period of folks moving out, so we need to prepare for hard times ahead no different than the COVID-19 pandemic. If companies wait too long to react to the disappearing act, it'll be too late.
Personal and laundry services
  • I am glad the government is now open. I think this will add to the business over the next six months.
Professional, scientific and technical services
  • [I am concerned about] instability in the U.S. government staying open or not and the tariff debate continuing to be represented to the U.S. as a good thing instead of a tax on U.S. consumers.
  • We find that our firm can be optimal with between 18 to 22 staff. With this size, we can be hands-on, make timely decisions and pivot quickly. We can cross-train our staff and be highly versatile. We work with many large firms, and regrettably, we do not find them to be as efficient.
  • The use of AI in our company is increasing. However, there may be too much time and "planning" to get work done versus "getting work done."
  • We think we are in a good position to start growing our company.
  • AI is increasing productivity a lot for companies of all sizes.
  • We hired a fifth employee to support the work we had in early 2025, which shifted our workloads so everyone could breathe a bit easier. With the anticipated slowdown of company contracts in 2026, we are nervous that we may, for the first time, have to consider cutting back on total compensation so we don't have to lay anyone off.
Publishing industries (except internet)
  • A confluence of factors is compounding to have a materially negative, even existential, impact on our business. Interest rates need to decline significantly, consumer sentiment needs to turn around rapidly, government spending needs to return materially and tariffs need to be either reverted to prior levels or tariff certainty needs to be delivered. AI is not and cannot add enough value to counter the deleterious impact of these combined forces.
Real estate
  • Faster, smarter and cheaper used to be goals. Now we do these things just to survive.
Rental and leasing services
  • Tariffs are the primary cause of our margin compression this year.
Support activities for transportation
  • At this point, it's been such a roller coaster of a mess, with the American trucking industry in dire straits due to reduced volumes and overcapacity, that I don't even know what to say other than simply: It's dismal.
Texas Retail Outlook Survey
Merchant wholesalers, nondurable goods
  • We are adding new business, and we will hire for growth in the next six months.

Questions regarding the Texas Business Outlook Surveys can be addressed to Emily Kerr at emily.kerr@dal.frb.org.

Sign up for our email alert to be automatically notified as soon as the latest surveys are released on the web.